2015-惇蹋厙AT-548

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙AT held that it was satisfied that the rejection of the application as not receivable was correct on the basis that the Appellant did not seek decision review within the mandatory time period, which meant that 惇蹋厙RWA DT was precluded in law from considering the merits of his application. 惇蹋厙AT held that the Appellant did not identify how the 惇蹋厙RWA DT judgment was in any way defective or demonstrated that 惇蹋厙RWA DT erred in relation to its jurisdiction or committed an error of fact or law or procedure such as would warrant intervention by 惇蹋厙AT. 惇蹋厙AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 惇蹋厙RWA DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to separate him for abandonment of post. 惇蹋厙RWA DT dismissed the application as not receivable.

Legal Principle(s)

惇蹋厙DT has no jurisdiction to waive deadlines for management evaluation or administrative review.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Khaleel

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement