爆料网

爆料网RWA Area Staff Rules

  • 111.2(3)
  • 111.2(3)b
  • Appendix to the Staff Rules 1-D/E effective 2015 (Salary Scale Gaza and West Bank)
  • Former Rule 106.1(16)
  • Former Rule 111.3
  • Former Rule 111.3(2)
  • Former Rule 111.3(4)
  • Rule 103.3
  • Rule 103.5
  • Rule 103.8.1
  • Rule 104.4
  • Rule 105.2
  • Rule 106.1(16)(D)(ii)
  • Rule 106.2
  • Rule 106.2(7)
  • Rule 106.2(9)
  • Rule 106.3
  • Rule 106.3.1
  • Rule 106.4
  • Rule 106.4(8)
  • Rule 107.9
  • Rule 109.1
  • Rule 109.2
  • Rule 109.2(5)
  • Rule 109.2(7)
  • Rule 109.4
  • Rule 109.4(2)
  • Rule 109.4(3)
  • Rule 109.5
  • Rule 109.7
  • Rule 109.7(7)
  • Rule 109.9(3)
  • Rule 110.1
  • Rule 110.2
  • Rule 110.3
  • Rule 111.1
  • Rule 111.2
  • Rule 111.2(1)
  • Rule 111.3
  • Rule 111.3(4)
  • Rule 111.4
  • Rule 112.3(D)
  • Rule 113.1
  • 爆料网RWA Staff Rule 111.2(5)
    • Showing 1 - 10 of 91
    2026-爆料网AT-1636, Wael Rabah

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT did not err in finding that the former staff member’s application was not receivable ratione materiae.The 爆料网AT found that DIOS had no decision-making authority in addressing the substance of his complaint of retaliation and that it undertook its investigation merely as a step in the investigative process that did not amount to a reviewable administrative decision.

    Similarly, the 爆料网AT found that the Ethics Office’s determination that it had not been established that retaliation had occurred, and its subsequent closure of the file without further investigation...

    2025-爆料网AT-1584, Noureddin Khaled Ahmed Saleh

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA Dispute Tribunal did not err in concluding that the former staff member’s claim regarding the calculation of Provident Fund benefits was unfounded because the Agency correctly applied the governing legal framework. The 爆料网AT found that, under Area Staff Rule 106.1(16)(D)(ii), the last published special interest rate applies up to and including the month immediately preceding payment. Since the payment was made in August 2022, the Agency properly applied PF Secretariat Circular PFS/08/2022, which declared a negative special interest rate of -15.18% for January–June...

    2025-爆料网AT-1585, Islam Isam Hafez Said

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA Dispute Tribunal did not err in concluding that the former staff member’s claim regarding the calculation of Provident Fund benefits was unfounded because the Agency correctly applied the governing legal framework. The 爆料网AT found that, under Area Staff Rule 106.1(16)(D)(ii), the last published special interest rate applies up to and including the month immediately preceding payment. Since the payment was made in August 2022, the Agency properly applied PF Secretariat Circular PFS/08/2022, which declared a negative special interest rate of -15.18% for January–June...

    2024-爆料网AT-1503-Corr.1, Amjad Issa

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT had appropriately concluded that Mr. Issa failed to submit a timely Request for Decision Review regarding the first of three months’ non-payment of his salary. However, the 爆料网AT held that, since each non-payment constitutes a separate administrative decision, Mr. Issa's Request for Decision Review regarding the second- and third-months’ non-payment was timely, rendering his application partially receivable.

    The 爆料网AT further concluded however, that since Mr. Issa disregarded a directive circulated before his annual leave (when he was able to check his e-mail)...

    2025-爆料网AT-1520, Shahd Ghabbash

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member’s transfer request had been approved by the West Bank Field Office but the Jordan Field Office had subsequently informed that the request could not be accommodated due to a commitment to the roadmap on hiring daily-paid workers in fixed-term posts.

    The 爆料网AT held that the Commissioner-General had demonstrated the efforts made by both Field Offices to process the transfer request and the Agency’s burden to show that the request had been given full and fair consideration was satisfied. The 爆料网AT found that the staff member had not discharged the burden of...

    2024-爆料网AT-1482, Maha Mohammad Issawi

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member had no legitimate expectation of renewal of her fixed-term appointment, as there was no evidence that the Administration had made any express promise that would have created such an expectation. On the contrary, the 爆料网AT found that the Administration had properly informed all affected staff, including the former staff member, of the last date of the MADAD Project and advertised 15 clerical posts internally, inviting staff to apply for alternative positions. The 爆料网AT further held that these actions should be viewed in light of the continuous efforts...

    2024-爆料网AT-1507, Mahmoud Ahmad Ali

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT rightly identified that the standard of proof for placing the staff member on ALWOP was whether there was reasonable suspicion or reasonable grounds to believe that the staff member had committed the alleged misconduct.

    The 爆料网AT rejected the staff member’s argument that his ex-wife’s withdrawal of the complaint against him in a national court should have stopped all investigations against him. The 爆料网AT noted that the national court had provided the case records to the Agency, and the Agency, following its complete assessment of the situation, can proceed with...

    2024-爆料网AT-1506, Amjad Al-Thaher

    The 爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网RWA DT’s determination of the former staff member’s chances of selection for the position at one-fourth on alternative grounds. The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT appropriately considered the possibility that the Agency could have introduced additional candidates on an equivalency basis during a second review after the shortlisting phase. In particular, the 爆料网RWA DT held that, since the sufficient number of candidates for a competitive exercise was normally between three to five candidates per vacancy, it was reasonable to expect that the Agency would have brought more...

    2024-爆料网AT-1417, Jafar Wakid

    The 爆料网AT held that none of the factors that the 爆料网RWA DT considered as warranting exceptional compensation, were indeed exceptional, either individually or collectively. The 爆料网AT found that the former staff member’s permanent staff status, his long service, his difficulties in finding subsequent employment, his status as a refugee, the unproven nature of the sexual harassment allegations, and the delays in his case, were not the type of circumstances that would warrant an exceptional compensation award. The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT erred in awarding in-lieu compensation above the...

    2024-爆料网AT-1421, Nuha Yahya Abduh Mohammad

    The 爆料网AT found that an objective reading of the staff member’s request for decision review showed clearly that she had only contested the second and not the first reprimand, both issued for not performing assigned teaching tasks. The 爆料网AT considered references to the official having issued it, its date and the remedy sought indicated in the request. The 爆料网AT therefore held that the 爆料网RWA DT had not erred in fact or in law when it considered that the staff member had not submitted a request for decision review in respect of the first reprimand and found the application in the respective part...