爆料网

爆料网AT RoP

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 71 - 80 of 319
    2024-爆料网AT-1462, Firas Mihyar

    The 爆料网AT first observed that the staff member dedicated parts of his appeal brief to challenging the findings of fact in an earlier 爆料网DT judgment concerning his disciplinary case. The 爆料网AT held that he was estopped from doing so because he did not appeal this earlier 爆料网DT judgment.

    The 爆料网AT was satisfied that when the 爆料网DT reviewed the disciplinary sanction imposed, the 爆料网DT properly considered previous cases involving comparable misconduct, as well as aggravating and mitigating factors. The mitigating factors raised by the staff member were considered by the Administration, but they simply...

    2024-爆料网AT-1460, Al Waleed Abdelrahman Abdrabou

    The 爆料网AT noted that the 爆料网DT had appropriately relied on the clear and convincing evidence to conclude that the staff member had submitted a medical insurance claim to Cigna for medical services that had never been provided.

    The 爆料网AT held that the evidence established that it was highly probable that the staff member had made the misrepresentation to Cigna with the intent to deceive and that his actions had been potentially prejudicial to the 爆料网DP which was subject to any loss from undue reimbursements.

    The 爆料网AT found that the staff member’s certification to Cigna of the correctness of the...

    2024-爆料网AT-1456, Surendra Bista

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erroneously concluded that there was clear and convincing evidence of the former staff member’s knowledge that he was in a prohibited family relationship with another staff member, Mr. S.R.B.

    Moreover, the 爆料网AT found that even if the information provided by the former staff member was false, he could not have intended to mislead the Organization by providing or omitting it. On the contrary, the evidence established that when he made his relevant applications, he did not know, and had no reason to know, that Mr. S.R.B. was employed by the United Nations. In...

    2024-爆料网AT-1444, Yelena Goldenberg

    The 爆料网AT held that the Administration did not act unreasonably or unlawfully in requiring the staff member to work from the office two days per week. It further held that relevant considerations, including the staff member’s personal and medical circumstances, were taken into consideration, and irrelevant considerations were excluded. The 爆料网AT also found that there was no obligation on the Administration to establish that the requested accommodations represented a disproportionate or undue burden on the workplace.

    The 爆料网AT also found no merit in the staff member’s argument that the lack of...

    2024-爆料网AT-1409, Lillian Ular

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member failed to provide evidence to prove entitlement to compensation for harm suffered. In particular, the 爆料网AT found that no evidence was submitted proving a nexus between the illegality committed and any harm suffered by the former staff member as a result. The 爆料网AT highlighted that the medical report submitted by the former staff member recorded that she had complained of lack of sleep and headaches “for several years” and that such symptoms were consistent with a previous diagnosed medical condition.

    As to the costs of the appeal, since there was no...

    2024-爆料网AT-1429, Hakam Shahwan

    The 爆料网AT held that with no evidence of a manifest abuse of proceedings by the Commissioner-General before the 爆料网RWA DT, nor any finding by the 爆料网RWA DT of such an abuse of proceedings, the legal cost orders made by the Dispute Tribunal did not accord with the terms of Article 10 of the 爆料网RWA DT Statute and were therefore unjustified and could not be sustained. Moreover, if the 爆料网AT considered that the legal costs were awarded by the 爆料网RWA DT under Article 10(5)(b) (which was not apparent from the Judgment), there existed no basis to justify such an order given the evidence before the Dispute...

    2024-爆料网AT-1437, Ibrahim Bah

    The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member had telecommuted from his home country for the entire academic year. The 爆料网AT found that payment of the educational grant required the physical presence of the staff member at their official duty station, with such payment to be suspended or adjusted for the period that they were telecommuting from outside the official duty station.

    The 爆料网AT held that it was not open to the staff member to rely on a defence that the Administration be estopped from relying on the applicable provisions in its interpretation of the circumstances under which the education...

    2024-爆料网AT-1438, Ann-Christin Raschdorf

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision, finding that none of the alleged new facts were “new facts” for the purpose of Article 11(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. The alleged new facts either occurred after the issuance of the 爆料网AT Judgment, were known to the Appeals Tribunal, or matters of law.

    The 爆料网AT granted the application for correction in part, to the extent that the 爆料网AT agreed with Ms. Raschdorf's argument that an error arose in paragraph 44 of the 爆料网AT Judgment where the 爆料网AT wrongly referred to the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims instead of the Pension Fund.

    Finally, the...

    2024-爆料网AT-1410, AAH

    The 爆料网AT held that the facts upon which the staff member relied in his application for revision all post-dated the 爆料网AT Judgment and therefore could not serve as a basis for revising or reconsidering the 爆料网AT’s prior conclusions. In particular, the 爆料网AT found that the staff member’s medical record, indicating a change in his condition after the issuance of the 爆料网AT Judgment, did not constitute grounds for revising it.

    However, the 爆料网AT granted the staff member’s request for anonymity for the present Judgment only, given the limited scope of the issues raised and the specific facts...

    2024-爆料网AT-1408, Hydar Daniel Mlouk Majook

    The 爆料网AT agreed with the 爆料网DT’s conclusion on the receivability of the application but suggested that the 爆料网DT should have applied a different methodology for determining it.

    The 爆料网AT held that the staff member did not have standing before the 爆料网DT regarding claims made in his former capacity as an individual contractor, and thus this claim failed on ratione personae grounds. The other claims made in his former capacity as staff member failed on ratione materiae grounds. He failed to prove that a specific request had been made to the Administration for certification of service. Absent any...