爆料网

爆料网AT RoP

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 231 - 240 of 319
    2017-爆料网AT-793, Muhsen

    爆料网AT held that the appeal was defective in that it failed to invoke the jurisdiction of 爆料网AT under Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute by not asserting that 爆料网DT had either exceeded its jurisdiction or competence, failed to exercise its jurisdiction, erred on a question of law, committed an error of procedure, such as to affect the decision of the case, or erred a question of fact, resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant also failed to comply with the requirements of Article 8(2) of the 爆料网AT RoP by not providing a brief explaining the legal basis of any of...

    2017-爆料网AT-790, Anshasi

    爆料网AT held that it was not persuaded that 爆料网RWA DT erred in procedure or otherwise exceeded its jurisdiction such as to warrant reversal of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网AT held that there was no reason to differ from 爆料网RWA DT’s findings that 爆料网RWA had no reason to refer the Appellant to a medical board and that the issue was not relevant as the Appellant did not contest that he was unfit for service, nor did he allege that his health problems were related to his service with 爆料网RWA. 爆料网AT further noted that, as the Appellant was over sixty years of age, he was not eligible for a disability...

    2017-爆料网AT-789, Barakat

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not complied with his obligations under Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that there were no errors of law, fact, or procedure in the 爆料网RWA DT judgment. 爆料网AT held that under the relevant Circular, the Administration only had a duty to consider the Appellant’s request to be transferred to a certain compound, but not his wish to be transferred to a certain school located in that compound. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment.

    2017-爆料网AT-782, Muindi

    爆料网AT held that the summary dismissal decision was unlawful because the due process rights under IMO’s Staff Regulations and Staff Rules were substantially violated. The Appellant had been charged with misconduct in the form of fraudulent activities undertaken to gain diplomatic accreditation, namely giving instructions to append an electronic signature to an official IMO communication without authorization or instruction by that colleague and misrepresenting his contractual status as internationally recruited in that communication. Noting that the Secretary-General of IMO considered the...

    2017-爆料网AT-779, Abu Hweidi et al.

    Ar爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT’s decision not to hold an oral hearing was a shortcoming since the parties had not agreed to the case being decided on the papers and the facts needed to be established by witnesses and/or further documentary evidence. On the question of bias and its possible bearing on the outcome of the selection process, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT should have engaged in a thorough examination of the facts, rather than drawing an inference. 爆料网AT held that the inference drawn by 爆料网RWA DT, that it was realistic to conclude that not all of the posts could be filled by suitable candidates...

    2017-爆料网AT-775, Onifade

    爆料网AT considered Mr Onifade’s application for revision of judgment No. 2016-爆料网AT-668. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence before it to support the application. 爆料网AT held that Mr Onifade had failed to show that the first MOP form was unknown to him at the time the judgment was rendered and he had presented no decisive fact which was, at the time the judgment was rendered, unknown to him and 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that the application did not meet the criteria established under Article 11(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute and Article 24 of the 爆料网AT RoP. 爆料网AT held that the application had no merit and dismissed it...

    2017-爆料网AT-770, Humackic

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly held that there had been compliance with all procedural obligations for a temporary appointment with regard to having two persons on the interview panel and that the selection exercise was not required to be reviewed by a CRB. 爆料网AT held that there was no duty imposed on the Administration to place unsuccessful candidates on a roster of pre-approved candidates. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence of any discrimination or harassment or any basis for awarding the Appellant any damages for moral injury. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT committed no error of law, fact, or...

    2017-爆料网AT-737, Likukela

    爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing, noting that the Appellant was not entitled to call evidence on appeal that she should have presented to 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly regarded itself as not competent to make medical findings contradicting the medical evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made no error in its finding that the ABCC’s recommendation had no connection with the attempted recovery of monies which was allegedly paid to the Appellant by the United Nations Federal Credit Union (爆料网FCU) by mistake. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was quite correct in its opinion that the...

    2017-爆料网AT-735, Awe

    爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2016-爆料网AT-667. Noting that there was no provision under its Rules of Procedure allowing for the submission of additional pleadings after the submission of comments to an application for revision of judgment and that no exceptional circumstances existed, 爆料网AT dismissed Mr Awe’s motion to file additional comments. 爆料网AT considered Mr Awe’s claim to have discovered new facts in the form of a report of the fact-finding panel which considered his complaints of abuse of authority and harassment which allegedly showed, in sum, the improper...

    2017-爆料网AT-734, Witold

    爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s motion for leave to file additional pleadings on the basis that the Appellant had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT decided to strike out the Appellant’s additional submission and not to take it into consideration. 爆料网AT found no fault in the 爆料网JSPF Standing Committee’s decision which was in full accord with the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was neither entitled to an increase in his pension benefit nor to a retroactive payment for the period of his reemployment as there is no legal basis for retroactive payment of these...