爆料网

爆料网AT RoP

  • Article 1.2
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 13
  • Article 15
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18bis
  • Article 18bis.1
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 20
  • Article 20.2
  • Article 22
  • Article 23
  • Article 24
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 27
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(a)
  • Article 29(b)
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 111 - 120 of 319
    2023-爆料网AT-1364, Mustapha Guenfoudi

    The 爆料网AT concluded that as a long-serving member of the Secretariat, Mr. Guenfoudi was aware of the required standards of performance for his function as a Verbatim Translator. The 爆料网AT also held that he had been given a fair opportunity to address his performance shortcomings, but he refused to participate in the two performance improvement plans. The 爆料网AT found that the Organization’s legal framework was clear that termination was a foreseeable action following two consecutive years of substandard performance ratings. The 爆料网AT also found that Mr. Guenfoudi’s allegations that his...

    2023-爆料网AT-1321, Diana Kenoly, Carolyne Alany Rumah, Felix Kwame and Nicholas Kariuki Kinyanjui in respect of Roselyne Kayeke Oming (deceased)

    The 爆料网AT dismissed both the appeal and the cross-appeal.

    As to the Secretary-General's cross-appeal against the 爆料网DT's decision on receivability, the 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT was correct not to dismiss the claims as unreceivable, but to investigate their merits.

    Turning to the merits, the 爆料网AT noted that death benefits under the Rules are not payable to beneficiaries nominated by a staff member, but to designated beneficiaries as defined by the Staff Rules (i.e. the surviving spouse or dependent children). The 爆料网AT found that Mr. Oming survived Ms. Oming and the substantial preponderance of...

    2023-爆料网AT-1316, Tejbir Singh Soni

    The 爆料网AT held that the factual and legal issues arising from this appeal have already been clearly defined by the parties and there is no need for further clarification through an oral hearing.

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT did not commit any errors when it found that the staff member’s application was irreceivable ratione materiae.

    The 爆料网AT noted that the 爆料网DT had correctly held that the staff member had knowledge of the alleged constructive dismissal on either the date that he reiterated his resignation, or at the latest when 爆料网ICEF accepted his resignation. His request for management...

    2023-爆料网AT-1340, Mubashara Iram

    The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT had not erred in holding that there had been clear and convincing evidence that the staff member harassed other staff members over a substantial period of time, and that this behaviour constituted serious misconduct. The 爆料网AT affirmed that there was clear and convincing evidence to support the seven allegations that Ms. Iram used abusive language, made insulting remarks, shouted and bullied individuals, engaged in inappropriate touching, and made unwelcome contacts with individuals at their homes after working hours. The 爆料网AT found that the staff member’s due...

    2023-爆料网AT-1331, Osvaldo Di Mario

    爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing and held that it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case, as required by Article 18(1) of the 爆料网AT Rules of Procedure. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in striking the evidence filed with the Appellant’s closing submissions or in refusing to hear the Appellant’s supervisors as witnesses. 爆料网AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant used the 爆料网HCR VAT exemption card and credit card for his personal use and that the disciplinary measure was proportionate to the nature and gravity of...

    2023-爆料网AT-1329, Claude Cahn

    The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT did not err in law or fact or exceed its jurisdiction and it dismissed the Secretary-General's appeal. The 爆料网AT found that the Administration had been made aware of the disharmonious working conditions within the Regional Office for Europe and had failed to take timely action. By exposing Mr. Cahn to harmful working conditions for a considerable amount of time (several months), the Administration failed in its duty of care vis-à-vis Mr. Cahn to timely implement preventive or interim measures and thus prevent any possible harm to his health, irrespective of whether...

    2022-爆料网AT-1307, ASR AHMED TOSON

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the interlocutory appeal as not receivable on grounds that the 爆料网DT had not clearly exceeded its competence or jurisdiction or assumed a jurisdiction it did not have when it consolidated Mr. Toson's cases. The 爆料网AT also agreed with the Secretary-General that Mr. Toson had advanced similar unsuccessful arguments in an earlier 爆料网AT case that he brought, but Mr. Toson refused to be guided by that judgment prior to pursuing the present appeal. The 爆料网AT put Mr. Toson on notice that he risks incurring an award of costs for vexatious litigation if he persists in pursuing the same...

    2022-爆料网AT-1286, Raed Mousa

    Mr. Mousa appealed. As regards Mr. Mousa’s request for an oral hearing, the 爆料网AT held that he did not provide a compelling reason why an oral hearing should be granted in this appeal. As the case deals with the issue of receivability ratione materiae, an oral hearing is not necessary and would not “assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case” within the meaning of Article 18(1) of the 爆料网AT’s Rules of Procedure. The 爆料网AT also found that Mr. Mousa’s appeal did not refer to any of the grounds of appeal mentioned in Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. The only submission regarding the...