爆料网

爆料网 Charter

  • Article 1.3
  • Article 1.4
  • Article 100
  • Article 100.1
  • Article 101
  • Article 101.1
  • Article 101.2
  • Article 101.3
  • Article 103
  • Article 105
  • Article 105.2
  • Article 17
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 55
  • Article 57
  • Article 63
  • Article 76
  • Article 8
  • Article 92
  • Article 97
  • Article 98
  • Chapter VII
  • Chapter XV
  • Charter of the United Nations, Article 101
  • Preamble
    • Showing 51 - 60 of 202
    2022-爆料网AT-1250, Giuseppe Belsito

    爆料网AT held that the undisputed breach of confidentiality in the selection process provided rational grounds for the cancellation decision. 爆料网AT held that the fact that the Appellant had access to information about his test score and that he was perhaps seeking to influence the decision through the hiring manager, rendered the selection exercise problematic and unsatisfactory. 爆料网AT held that the perception was unavoidably created that the Appellant was inappropriately favoured with access to information about a decision concerning his interests and in respect of which he enjoyed no authority...

    2022-爆料网AT-1248, Vladislav Krioutchkov

    Mr. Krioutchkov appealed. 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT correctly held that the timing of the written test was justifiable in that holding the test at a set hour worldwide was a rational way of avoiding leaks of the test materials. The inconvenience to the Administration of accommodating different test schedules outweighed the inconvenience of Mr. Krioutchkov being required to adjust his schedule. The scheduling decision was accordingly reasonable. Moreover, having refused to participate in the written examination, Mr. Krioutchkov was estopped from challenging the non-selection decision. 爆料网AT found...

    2022-爆料网AT-1204, null Secretary-General

    The Secretary-General filed an appeal. 爆料网AT granted the appeal and vacated the 爆料网DT Judgment. 爆料网AT held that while the determination of which staff members should be compared is “primarily guided by the functional title as per the staff member’s letter of appointment”, there can be cases where the functional title does not reflect the actual functions performed as in the present case. In these circumstances, the CHRO must determine which individual falls into which occupational group. Ms. Barud’s role and functions changed in May 2018 to a Facilities Management Assistant. Therefore, at the...

    2010-爆料网AT-088, Megerditchian

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to find that it was not competent to consider the application as far as it concerned the decision not to award Ms Megerditchian a service contract since such contracts were awarded to non-staff members. However, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in receiving the application in respect of a service contract. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in its interpretation of the term priority consideration and that a promise of priority consideration in a job application did not by itself give rise to a legal right on the part of Ms...

    2010-爆料网AT-084, Sanwidi

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT rejected an application by the Staff Union of the ICTY for leave to file a friend-of-the court brief under Article 17 of its Rules of Procedure on the scope of review of the Secretary-General’s decision in disciplinary proceedings and the standard of proof in disciplinary proceedings, on the basis that the facts and legal issues were not so complex that the brief would assist it. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT, in exercising judicial review, may interfere with the exercise of the Secretary-General’s discretion in disciplinary proceedings against a staff member on the ground...

    2011-爆料网AT-130, Koda

    爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment. 爆料网AT held that OIOS operates under the “authority” of the Secretary-General but has “operational independence”. 爆料网AT further noted that, insofar as the contents and procedures of an individual report are concerned, the Secretary-General has no power to influence or interfere with OIOS. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT also has no jurisdiction to do so, as it can only review the Secretary-General’s administrative decisions. 爆料网AT, however, noted that to the extent that any OIOS decisions are used to affect staff members’ terms or contract of employment, OIOS’ reports may be...

    2011-爆料网AT-120, Gabaldon

    爆料网AT recalled that an employment contract of a staff member subject to the internal laws of the Organisation is not the same as a contract between private parties and that the issuance of a letter of appointment by the Administration cannot be regarded as a mere formality. The issue before 爆料网AT was whether the staff member, who had received an offer of employment, but not a letter of appointment, from the Organisation, should be regarded as a staff member and thus should have access to the internal justice system to contest the legality of the Administration’s withdrawal of the offer of...

    2012-爆料网AT-265, Ljungdell

    Regarding the allegations that 爆料网DT erred in law, fact, and procedure and failed to exercise its jurisdiction in relation to her allegations of discrimination, 爆料网AT held that the burden was on the Appellant to establish that the oral and documentary evidence, if admitted, would have led to different findings of fact, and changed the outcome of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred in rejecting the Appellant’s allegations that she had been subjected to discrimination on the grounds of gender or based on her family responsibilities and her expressed desire to work part-time. Regarding the...

    2012-爆料网AT-259, De Saint Robert

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to put forward evidence that the selection process for the post for which she had applied had been vitiated by any irregularity or of the existence of bias or misconduct in considering her candidacy. 爆料网AT held that all the stages of the procedure had been followed and that the Appellant had benefitted from an objective examination and equal treatment to which all applicants are entitled. 爆料网AT held that, in view of the evidence, the Appellant had no real chance of being appointed or shortlisted between the three candidates recommended. 爆料网AT held that...

    2013-爆料网AT-342, Manco

    爆料网AT considered two appeals by the Secretary-General of judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2012/104 and 爆料网DT/2012/135. Noting that, where the Administration chooses not to provide a written decision, it cannot lightly argue receivability ratione temporis, 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment on receivability. On the merits, 爆料网AT held that the contested policy, requiring Mr Manco to renounce his permanent resident status in a country not of his nationality as a condition for becoming a staff member of the Organisation at the professional level, was not reflected in any administrative issuance and concluded that it...