爆料网

Receivability

  • Receivability
  • Retaliation
  • Whistleblower
    • Showing 1 - 4 of 4
    2025-爆料网AT-1560, Emma Reilly

     

    The 爆料网AT held that the former staff member’s challenge was to a recommendation of the Alternate Chair of the Ethics Panel, and as an ethics recommendation, it was not an administrative decision subject to judicial review. Thus, the 爆料网DT correctly dismissed this part of the application as not receivable.

    The 爆料网AT further found that the Administration’s rejection of the March 2020 Alternate Chair’s report and recommendation could not have been understood by the Ethics Office to be a request to conduct a new review. The 爆料网AT observed that the evidence before the 爆料网DT was that the decision was...

    2011-爆料网AT-130, Koda

    爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment. 爆料网AT held that OIOS operates under the “authority” of the Secretary-General but has “operational independence”. 爆料网AT further noted that, insofar as the contents and procedures of an individual report are concerned, the Secretary-General has no power to influence or interfere with OIOS. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT also has no jurisdiction to do so, as it can only review the Secretary-General’s administrative decisions. 爆料网AT, however, noted that to the extent that any OIOS decisions are used to affect staff members’ terms or contract of employment, OIOS’ reports may be...

    2016-爆料网AT-673, Nquyen-Kropp & Postica

    爆料网AT first considered the receivability of the appeal and held that it was receivable, pursuant to Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT further held that the Ethics Office is limited to making recommendations, which are not administrative decisions subject to judicial review, to the Administration. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made no error in dismissing the applications on the ground that the Ethics Office matters were not administrative decisions subject to judicial review. 爆料网AT acknowledged that the Ethics Office failed in its duty to make a recommendation pursuant to Section 5.7 of ST/SGB/2005/21...

    2021-爆料网AT-1079, Reilly

    爆料网AT agreed with the 爆料网DT finding that it lacked jurisdiction in respect of the staff member’s application to review the determination of the Second Alternate Chair. 爆料网AT noted that the subject matter jurisdiction of 爆料网DT is limited to the review of administrative decisions. The determinations of the Second Alternate Chair do not constitute administrative decisions, and as such, any application to review them before the 爆料网DT is not receivable. 爆料网AT highlighted that ST/SGB/2017/2/Rev.1 confers on the Ethics Office only the power to recommend, advise and refer, and Section 10.3 of ST/SGB/2017/2/...