爆料网

Judge Chapman

Judge Chapman

Showing 81 - 100 of 170
2017-爆料网AT-763, Crotty

Unat a considéré un appel du secrétaire général. Unat a jugé que la décision de mettre fin à M. Crotty en raison de l'abolition du poste n'a jamais été mise en ?uvre parce qu'il a obtenu un autre poste auprès de l'organisation et que cela a rendu la décision de l'administration de le mettre fin. Unat a jugé que la décision administrative n'était plus une question en direct et que 爆料网T n'était pas compétente pour porter un jugement sur la demande. Unat a jugé que 爆料网DT avait commis une erreur de droit lorsqu'elle a constaté que la demande de M. Crotty. Unat a jugé qu'à la lumière de l'erreur de l...

2017-爆料网AT-764, Zachariah

Unat a considéré un appel du secrétaire général. Unat a tenu que l'爆料网DT a correctement déterminé que M. Zachariah contestions une décision administrative qui produisait des conséquences juridiques directes affectant son emploi. Unat a jugé qu'il n'y avait aucun fondement à la plainte que Undt avait commis une erreur en droit et dépassait sa juridiction en considérant les questions au-delà de la portée de la demande de M. Zachariah pour l'évaluation de la gestion et la réponse de l'unité d'évaluation de la gestion, sur la base qu'il s'agissait du r?le de 爆料网DT pour interpréter et comprendre...

2017-爆料网AT-766, Alsado

Unat a considéré un appel du secrétaire général. Unat a jugé que la décision de mettre fin à M. Alsado en raison de l'abolition du poste n'a jamais été mise en ?uvre parce qu'il a obtenu un autre poste auprès de l'organisation et que cela a rendu la décision de l'administration de le mettre fin. Unat a jugé que la décision administrative n'était plus une question en direct et que 爆料网T n'était pas compétente pour porter un jugement sur la demande. Unat a jugé que 爆料网DT avait commis une erreur de droit lorsqu'elle a révélé que la demande de la demande de M. Alsado. Unat a jugé qu'à la lumière de l...

2017-爆料网AT-762, Lemmonier

Unat a considéré un appel du secrétaire général. En ce qui concerne la créance, contrairement à l'affirmation de M. Lemonnier selon laquelle l'appel du secrétaire général n'est pas à recevoir parce que le jugement contesté ne lui a pas accordé de dommages et n'était que ?une victoire morale?, Unat a jugé que le succès avant de ne dépend de la question de savoir si le personnel La demande du membre est accordée, en tout ou en partie, pas sur le recours accordé au membre du personnel, et que le membre du personnel peut prévaloir ou réussir sa réclamation sans recevoir de dommages-intérêts. Selon...

2017-爆料网AT-752, Baguma et al.

Unat a jugé que les appelants n'avaient soulevé ni la différence factuelle ni des problèmes juridiques différents de ceux qui ont été interrogés dans les affaires compagnons et éliminé dans le jugement n ° 2017-爆料网AT-750 (Kagizi et al.) Et 爆料网AT a donc adopté le raisonnement de son jugement antérieur aux paragraphes 18-27. 爆料网AT a rejeté les appels et a confirmé les jugements 爆料网DT.

2013-爆料网AT-306, Ming Wu

爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Wu and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the cross-appeal was receivable, despite it being a default judgment and the Secretary-General not having been allowed to participate in the proceedings or to file a reply. 爆料网AT held that the application was not receivable ratione materiae on the basis that he had not made a timely request for management evaluation. 爆料网AT held that therefore 爆料网DT had no jurisdiction to address the merits of the claims in the application and those claims were not properly before 爆料网AT for consideration. 爆料网AT held that...

2017-爆料网AT-763, Crotty

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr. Crotty due to abolition of post was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr. Crotty’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...

2017-爆料网AT-764, Zachariah

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held the 爆料网DT correctly determined that Mr. Zachariah was challenging an administrative decision that produced direct legal consequences affecting his employment. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the complaint that 爆料网DT erred in law and exceeded its jurisdiction by considering matters beyond the scope of Mr. Zachariah’s request for management evaluation and the Management Evaluation Unit’s response, on the basis that it was the role of 爆料网DT to adequately interpret and comprehend the application and that 爆料网DT had the inherent power to...

2017-爆料网AT-766, Alsado

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr Alsado due to abolition of post was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr Alsado’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of the 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...

2017-爆料网AT-762, Lemmonier

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. On the issue of receivability, contrary to Mr Lemonnier’s contention that the Secretary-General’s appeal is not receivable because the impugned judgment did not award him any damages and was mere “a moral victory”, 爆料网AT held that success before 爆料网DT depends on whether the staff member’s application is granted, in whole or in part, not on the remedy afforded to the staff member, and that the staff member may prevail or succeed on his claim(s) without receiving an award of damages. According to 爆料网AT, as the unsuccessful party before 爆料网DT, the...

2017-爆料网AT-752, Baguma et al.

爆料网AT held that the Appellants had raised neither factual difference nor legal issues different from those canvassed in companion cases and disposed of in judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-750 (Kagizi et al. ) and 爆料网AT, therefore, adopted the reasoning from its prior judgment at paragraphs 18-27. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgments.

2017-爆料网AT-740, Auda

爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the Appellant’s claims that 爆料网DT failed to exercise its jurisdiction or erred in law by using the summary judgment procedure to determine the application was not receivable ratione materiae. 爆料网AT held that the application to 爆料网DT did not challenge an administrative decision that was alleged to be in non-compliance with the terms of appointment or the contract of employment of the staff member, rather the Appellant challenged the MEU’s wording in a letter to him acknowledging the receipt of his grievance or complaint. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in law...

2017-爆料网AT-730, El-Kholy

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the central question before it was whether the Organisation complied with its obligation to Ms. El-Kholy to find her a suitable post. 爆料网AT held that the Administration failed in its obligation to demonstrate that all reasonable and good faith efforts had been made to consider the staff member for available and suitable posts within 爆料网DP before terminating her permanent appointment. 爆料网AT held that the Administration’s obligation to find a vacant and suitable post did not shift to the Appellant, regardless of the following: her...

2017-爆料网AT-731, Nikwigize

爆料网AT noted that there was no dispute as to the applicable statutory provision governing the timeliness of the Appellant’s application to 爆料网DT or that management evaluation was not required as the Appellant was challenging a disciplinary measure. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s application was not receivable ratione temporis, noting that the Appellant himself acknowledged that his application was untimely. On the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网DT erred in not waiving the time limit for him to file the application due to exceptional circumstances, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly applied judgment No. 2011...

2017-爆料网AT-727, Khan

爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网DT ruling that the 2010 decisions were time-barred and not receivable ratione temporis. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT acted ultra vires or in excess of its competence and jurisdiction by considering whether the Appellant had shown exceptional circumstances justifying a waiver of the filing deadline, and thus held that the relevant paragraphs of the 爆料网DT judgment were obiter dicta and should be stricken. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in holding the Appellant’s motion or request for waiver of the deadline as not receivable ratione temporis on the basis that while it was not timely, that did...

2017-爆料网AT-717, Yousef

After Mr. Yousef’s appeal and the Commissioner-General’s cross-appeal had been submitted, Mr. Yourself filed a motion to withdraw the appeal based on the fact that an internal settlement had been agreed with 爆料网RWA and the Commissioner-General filed a motion to withdraw the cross-appeal. 爆料网AT directed the Registrar to close the case.

2017-爆料网AT-715, Charot

On the issue of 爆料网DT’s denial of the Appellant’s request for confidentiality, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in law or fact in denying her request as if confidentiality were attached to the identity of each staff member, there would be no transparency. 爆料网AT did not admit into evidence additional documents as they were of no assistance to it and there were no exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant merely gave passing reference to the 爆料网AT Statute’s grounds of appeal and offered no legal authority to support her claims. 爆料网AT agreed with the characterization of the issue by 爆料网DT...

2016-爆料网AT-683, Featherstonet al.

爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeal. 爆料网AT upheld 爆料网DT’s determination and noted that it gave a clear directive to the Administration that, upon remand, it should consider staff member’s suitability for conversion to a permanent appointment “by reference to the relevant circumstances as they stood at the time of the first impugned refusal to convert her appointment” and that the Administration failed to comply with the said directive. 爆料网AT also agreed with 爆料网DT that the Assistant Secretary-General for Office of Human Resources Management failed to give any consideration whatsoever to...

2016-爆料网AT-684, Ademagic et al.

爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeal and Ademagic’s cross-appeal. 爆料网AT upheld 爆料网DT’s determination that the Assistant Secretary-General for Office of Human Resources Management did not give meaningful individual consideration to the staff members’ requests for conversion to permanent appointments. 爆料网AT noted that it gave a clear directive to the Administration that, upon remand, it should consider the staff members’ suitability for conversion to permanent appointments “by reference to the relevant circumstances as they stood at the time of the first impugned refusal to convert their...