爆料网

爆料网AT

Showing 1231 - 1240 of 1669
2017-爆料网AT-778, Faust

爆料网AT rejected the argument that the written test should have been prepared by the Hiring Manager, and not the direct supervisor of the position. 爆料网AT held, in agreement with the 爆料网DT’s conclusion, that the Appellant had failed to show that the Hiring Manager’s intervention in the preparation of the written test resulted in her non-selection for the contested post. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claim was fully and fairly considered by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT found no fault in 爆料网DT’s finding that the design, conduct, and evaluation of the written test did not constitute a violation of the Appellant’s right...

2017-爆料网AT-779, Abu Hweidi et al.

Ar爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT’s decision not to hold an oral hearing was a shortcoming since the parties had not agreed to the case being decided on the papers and the facts needed to be established by witnesses and/or further documentary evidence. On the question of bias and its possible bearing on the outcome of the selection process, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT should have engaged in a thorough examination of the facts, rather than drawing an inference. 爆料网AT held that the inference drawn by 爆料网RWA DT, that it was realistic to conclude that not all of the posts could be filled by suitable candidates...

2017-爆料网AT-733, Nadeau

爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT had not committed an error of procedure by denying the Appellant an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT enjoys a wide margin of discretion in all matters relating to case management and there was no error in the proceedings before 爆料网DT with specific consideration of the following: 爆料网DT’s denial of the proceedings to be conducted in French; 爆料网DT’s dismissal of objections to English translations in the application and other documents, 爆料网DT’s issuance of its judgment before having the Secretary-General’s reply...

2017-爆料网AT-734, Witold

爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s motion for leave to file additional pleadings on the basis that the Appellant had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT decided to strike out the Appellant’s additional submission and not to take it into consideration. 爆料网AT found no fault in the 爆料网JSPF Standing Committee’s decision which was in full accord with the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was neither entitled to an increase in his pension benefit nor to a retroactive payment for the period of his reemployment as there is no legal basis for retroactive payment of these...

2017-爆料网AT-735, Awe

爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2016-爆料网AT-667. Noting that there was no provision under its Rules of Procedure allowing for the submission of additional pleadings after the submission of comments to an application for revision of judgment and that no exceptional circumstances existed, 爆料网AT dismissed Mr Awe’s motion to file additional comments. 爆料网AT considered Mr Awe’s claim to have discovered new facts in the form of a report of the fact-finding panel which considered his complaints of abuse of authority and harassment which allegedly showed, in sum, the improper...

2017-爆料网AT-736, Williams

爆料网AT held that the Applicant was not entitled to a widow’s benefit under Article 34 of the 爆料网JPSF Regulations as she married Mr Williams, her deceased husband, after his separation from service. 爆料网AT noted that, under Article 35ter of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations, the survivor’s benefit had to be purchased by a retiree who marries after separation from service as an annuity within a prescribed one-year deadline after the date of the marriage. 爆料网AT noted that Mr Williams had elected not to do so. 爆料网AT held that there was no obligation for 爆料网JSPF to inform Mr Williams of the option. 爆料网AT held that...

2017-爆料网AT-737, Likukela

爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing, noting that the Appellant was not entitled to call evidence on appeal that she should have presented to 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly regarded itself as not competent to make medical findings contradicting the medical evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made no error in its finding that the ABCC’s recommendation had no connection with the attempted recovery of monies which was allegedly paid to the Appellant by the United Nations Federal Credit Union (爆料网FCU) by mistake. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was quite correct in its opinion that the...

2017-爆料网AT-738, Bertrand

爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that there was nothing to support the Appellant’s submission that 爆料网DT erred in finding that he had not exercised reasonable care by expecting the same standard of care from him as from the Operations Response Unit supervisor. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s finding that the Appellant was not on duty at the relevant time was fully supported by the facts and was not in error. Contrary to the Appellant’s submission, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not suggest that the Appellant intended to cause the loss or foresaw the loss, nor did the...

2017-爆料网AT-748, Sharbaji

爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT’s finding. 爆料网AT held that no purpose would have been served by the conduct of an evaluation exercise for a post that was about to be or had been abolished. 爆料网AT accepted the 爆料网RWA DT’s finding that there was a genuine redundancy situation. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence before it to support the Appellant’s contention that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

2017-爆料网AT-749, Ayoub

爆料网AT held that there was no evidence before it to support the contention that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law. 爆料网AT upheld the findings of 爆料网RWA DT that there was no evidence that the decision to abolish the Appellant’s post was arbitrary or capricious, motivated by prejudice or extraneous factors, or was flawed by procedural irregularity or error of law. 爆料网AT held that there was evidence of a process that was motivated by budgetary constraints as well as concerns about the effective management of a redundancy process. 爆料网AT found no procedural irregularity or any error in law on the part of 爆料网RWA DT...