2017-惇蹋厙AT-748

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙AT agreed with 惇蹋厙RWA DT＊s finding. 惇蹋厙AT held that no purpose would have been served by the conduct of an evaluation exercise for a post that was about to be or had been abolished. 惇蹋厙AT accepted the 惇蹋厙RWA DT＊s finding that there was a genuine redundancy situation. 惇蹋厙AT held that there was no evidence before it to support the Appellant＊s contention that 惇蹋厙RWA DT erred in law. 惇蹋厙AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 惇蹋厙RWA DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to abolish his post and declare him provisionally redundant. 惇蹋厙RWA DT rejected the Applicant＊s procedural challenge that he had not been evaluated before being declared provisionally redundant. 惇蹋厙RWA DT concluded that there was a genuine redundancy situation and dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Sharbaji

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement