爆料网

爆料网AT

Showing 1061 - 1070 of 1669
2015-爆料网AT-527, Dhanjee

爆料网AT upheld the Secretary-General’s claim that the Hiring Manager more than minimally demonstrated that she gave the Appellant’s candidature full and fair consideration. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT properly applied the standard of judicial review to determine whether the Hiring Manager’s decision that the Appellant was not among the most qualified for the post was reasonable. 爆料网AT held there was no reason to reverse the findings of 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant merely repeated the arguments he made before 爆料网DT and expressed his disagreement with the findings of the Hiring Manager. 爆料网AT held that...

2015-爆料网AT-528, Rantisi

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General of the order rescinding the decision to transfer the Appellant and the moral damages award. On the Commissioner-General’s argument that 爆料网DT unduly fettered its discretion to award compensation in lieu of specific performance, 爆料网AT held that, absent any error of law or manifestly unreasonable factual findings, which were not evident, 爆料网AT would not interfere with the discretion vested in 爆料网RWA DT to decide on remedy. 爆料网AT held that, in all of the circumstances of the case, it was not persuaded by the Commissioner-General’s argument that...

2015-爆料网AT-529, Riano

爆料网AT considered an appeal of judgment Nos. 爆料网RWA/DT/2013/035 and 爆料网RWA/DT/2014/004. 爆料网AT held that there was no basis to support the Appellant’s claim of legitimate expectations and/or rights for the renewal of his contract. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT erred with respect to the amount awarded for al damages. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT evaluated all the evidence before it and made a reasoned assessment as to the amount of anxiety and stress suffered by the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that it would not lightly interfere with the determination of 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT held...

2015-爆料网AT-530, Ovcharenko et al.

爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Ovcharenko et al. and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. On the request of Mr Ovcharenko et al. for an oral hearing before the full bench of 爆料网AT, 爆料网AT held that the parties had no standing to request that the case be decided by a full bench and, accordingly, denied the request. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct when it examined the merits of the application and concluded that the administrative decision was lawful. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had to comply with the General Assembly decision 67/551 of 24 December 2012 and the ensuing enactment of...

2015-爆料网AT-568, Lebouef et al.

On the Appellants’ motion for contempt and request to strike specific paragraphs from the Respondent’s Answer, 爆料网AT found no basis to grant the relief sought but stated it would deal with the issue in the judgment. On the Appellants’ complaints about the number of witnesses permitted to testify, 爆料网AT held that: insofar as the Appellants’ sought to impugn the 爆料网DT judgment on the basis of the number of witnesses permitted to testify, there was no merit in such an argument and it found no error of procedure such as to affect the decision in the case; and there was no merit in the argument that...

2015-爆料网AT-513, Simmons

爆料网AT considered an application for execution. 爆料网AT noted that Ms Simmons maintained that there was a sum of money due and owed to her relating to judgment No. 2012-爆料网AT-221. 爆料网AT held that Ms Simmons’ contentions were not sustained. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General fully complied with judgment No. 2012-爆料网AT-221, as corrected by Order No. 148 (2013). 爆料网AT rejected the application for execution.

2015-爆料网AT-514, Abu Nada

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly determined that it did not have jurisdiction to review the decision to suspend him without pay. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was alert to the injury which the prolonged delay caused the Appellant. On the Appellant’s complaint that 爆料网RWA DT did not address his complaint regarding the deduction by 爆料网RWA from his personal Provident Fund contributions upon his dismissal, apparently, to recoup an overpayment, 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the complaint and the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error of law or fact on the part of the 爆料网RWA DT when it determined these...

2015-爆料网AT-515, von der Schulenburg

爆料网AT considered the consolidated appeals of judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2013/178 and 爆料网DT/2014/041. The Appellant had filed Motions to Withdraw and Strike both of his appeals on the ground that mediation was successful and all claims/disputes were settled between the parties. 爆料网AT granted the Appellant’s motions and directed the Registrar to close 爆料网AT Case Nos. 2014-589 and 2014-621.

2015-爆料网AT-516, Fiala

爆料网AT considered two appeals by the Secretary-General against Order No. 136 (NBI/2010) and judgment No. 爆料网DT/2014/007. 爆料网AT held that it was not satisfied that the actions of the Secretary-General in filing two appeals amounted to an abuse of process and declined Ms Fiala’s application for an award of costs against the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that there was no error of law or fact on the part of 爆料网DT in deeming Ms Fiala’s application receivable. Noting that the weight to be attributed to evidence was a matter for 爆料网DT, 爆料网AT held that the arguments advanced by the Secretary-General did not...

2015-爆料网AT-517, Terragnolo

爆料网AT held that there was no reason to depart from its prior analysis that the 爆料网JSPF was not part of the Secretariat and neither the Secretary-General nor the executive head of any other member organisation, has authority over the management of 爆料网JSPF or the independence of the Chief Executive Officer of 爆料网JSPF in the administration of its staff. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had no power to interfere or intervene in the election of members to the 爆料网JSPF’s staff pension committees; those elections were governed exclusively by 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网DT...