爆料网

English

Showing 1241 - 1250 of 4321
2013-爆料网AT-337, Leal

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that grounds existed to discharge Mr Leal for misconduct, without needing to address the issue of the alleged circumvention of the recruitment process for the purposes of hiring. 爆料网AT held that the misconduct and disciplinary measure of dismissal fell within the discretion of the Secretary-General and could not be seen as disproportionate to the offences unless it was the result of proven abuse or arbitrary exercise of that discretion. 爆料网AT held that the key elements of Mr Leal’s due process were met. 爆料网AT held that, since the...

2013-爆料网AT-335, Christensen

爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to establish any errors warranting the reversal of the 爆料网DT judgment concerning her entitlements. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT correctly concluded that the claim was not receivable. 爆料网AT recalled that 爆料网DT has no jurisdiction to waive the deadlines for management evaluation or administrative review. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2013-爆料网AT-336, Akello

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that Ms Akello’s involvement in the private company Blessed Seasons, which was on a 爆料网 list of companies providing escort vehicle services, met the standard of business activity and enterprise prohibited by former Staff Regulation 1. 2(m) and that her activities amounted to a conflict of interest. 爆料网AT held that, in ruling otherwise, 爆料网DT erred in law and fact and the Secretary-General’s appeal succeeded on that ground. On the issue of whether the very fact that the Internal Affairs Unit investigation, having...

2013-爆料网AT-331, Faraj

爆料网AT held that, given the written instructions provided to the Appellant, it was completely understandable that he proceeded to request again the review of the contested decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred when it found that he ought not to have done so and could not claim to have been legitimately misled as to the appeals procedure. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA’s holding that the Appellant should have known the applicable legal framework and filed his appeal on time was unsustainable. 爆料网AT noted that the Commissioner-General did not dispute the Appellant’s claim that the 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rules...

2013-爆料网AT-332, McCluskey

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not commit an error of fact or law when it concluded that the difference of treatment between the Appellant and his former colleagues who had undergone a competitive selection process was lawful. 爆料网AT held that it was reasonable and lawful to treat them differently at the time of deciding about the possible extension of his fixed-term appointment because equality meant not only the equal treatment of equals but also the unequal treatment of unequal. 爆料网AT held that there was no flaw in the motivation of the impugned judgment that could result in a manifestly unreasonable...

2013-爆料网AT-314, Mpacko

爆料网AT held that Ms Mpacko’s claims addressed the merits of the 爆料网DT decision and did not amount to claims that the 爆料网DT exceeded its competence or jurisdiction in denying her application for suspension of action. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not exceed its competence or jurisdiction in denying Ms Mpacko’s application for suspension of action. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable.

2013-爆料网AT-325, Servas

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err by not considering the various provisions of Staff Rule 3. 18. 爆料网AT held that a staff member’s failure to meet the requirements of either Annex IV or Staff Rule 3. 18 precluded the staff member from being eligible for a repatriation grant and, since the Appellant did not meet the requirement of Annex IV, that she relocate after separation from service, there was no need for 爆料网DT to consider whether she met the conditions for eligibility under Staff Rule 3. 18(c). 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in determining the Appellant was not eligible for a repatriation...

2013-爆料网AT-326, Jibara

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General and a cross-appeal by Mr Jibara. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT lacked jurisdiction to decide on the scope of the Oslo Accords signed by Israel and the Palestinian National Authority or the legality of the detention and imprisonment. 爆料网AT recalled that it was not the role of 爆料网DT to substitute its own decision for that of the Administration. 爆料网AT recalled that, having established misconduct and the seriousness of the incident, 爆料网AT cannot review the level of a sanction imposed except in cases of obvious absurdity or flagrant arbitrariness. 爆料网AT...

2013-爆料网AT-313, Gehr

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly determined that no appealable administrative decision was identified by the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly assessed the actions and/or omissions against the definition of an administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in law when it stated that the Administration’s proposed alternative did not qualify as a final decision, nor could it be considered as a decision not to proceed with the rebuttal process. 爆料网AT held that there was nothing in the Appellant’s written or oral submissions to persuade 爆料网AT that 爆料网DT made any error of law or fact in...