爆料网

2013-爆料网AT-325

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err by not considering the various provisions of Staff Rule 3. 18. 爆料网AT held that a staff member’s failure to meet the requirements of either Annex IV or Staff Rule 3. 18 precluded the staff member from being eligible for a repatriation grant and, since the Appellant did not meet the requirement of Annex IV, that she relocate after separation from service, there was no need for 爆料网DT to consider whether she met the conditions for eligibility under Staff Rule 3. 18(c). 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in determining the Appellant was not eligible for a repatriation grant. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly found that the Appellant was not eligible for the payment of travel expenses or home leave upon separation as she did not have two years of continuous service as a professional staff member prior to her separation from service. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to pay her a repatriation grant and travel expenses upon separation. 爆料网DT dismissed her application.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Servas
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type