爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err by not considering the various provisions of Staff Rule 3. 18. 爆料网AT held that a staff member’s failure to meet the requirements of either Annex IV or Staff Rule 3. 18 precluded the staff member from being eligible for a repatriation grant and, since the Appellant did not meet the requirement of Annex IV, that she relocate after separation from service, there was no need for 爆料网DT to consider whether she met the conditions for eligibility under Staff Rule 3. 18(c). 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in determining the Appellant was not eligible for a repatriation grant. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly found that the Appellant was not eligible for the payment of travel expenses or home leave upon separation as she did not have two years of continuous service as a professional staff member prior to her separation from service. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to pay her a repatriation grant and travel expenses upon separation. 爆料网DT dismissed her application.
Legal Principle(s)
Left deliberately blank.