惇蹋厙DT/2021/083

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙DT held that the application was not receivable ratione materiate, as the Applicant did not request management evaluation, as required. 惇蹋厙DT dismissed the application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to terminate his contract and alleged abuse of authority.

Legal Principle(s)

惇蹋厙DT has jurisdiction to consider applications only against administrative decisions for which applicants have timely requested management evaluation.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Prakash

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement