��DT/2021/030

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��DT found the application materially receivable as it concerned a decision that was appropriately the subject of judicial review. ��DT found that the decision to reassign the Applicant rather than place her on administrative leave, was taken balancing her best interest with those of the Organization. These reasons were supported by evidence. The Tribunal further held that the Applicant failed to meet her burden of proving any improper motive, irregularity or unlawfulness on the part of the Respondent in the decision to re-assign her duties. ��DT therefore held that the presumption of regularity stood. ��DT dismissed the application on the merits.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the Respondent��s decision to temporarily reassign her functions as Head of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (��ODC) Office in Albania.

Legal Principle(s)

A discretionary administrative decision can be challenged on the grounds that the Respondent has not acted fairly, or transparently or was motivated by bias, prejudice, or improper motives. ��AT jurisprudence recognizes a presumption of regularity in the performance of administrative functions and decision making. It is for the Applicant alleging any of these grounds of challenge to bear the initial burden of proving it in their application.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Banaj

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement