��DT/2020/102

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The application was not receivable because the Applicant did not derive negative consequences from the putative error in the EOD date.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the Administration��s refusal to retroactively change her entry on duty (��EOD��) date with the United Nations Common System (��CS��) from 30 July 2008 to 15 October 1996.

Legal Principle(s)

Entry of data in the official record is a prefatory/preparatory act. Thus, a decision refusing to correct an EOD date is not appealable as such a staff member may only appeal when an incorrect entry misinforms a decision causing concrete negative consequence for the terms of appointment or contract.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

Outcome Extra Text

There was no appealable administrative decision.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Eng

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement