惇蹋厙DT/2019/044

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

The Tribunal noted that according to the Applicant＊s submission, he was notified of the contested decision on 19 May 2017. Therefore, the 90-day time limit to institute proceedings before the Tribunal expired on 17 August 2017. It followed that when the Applicant submitted his incomplete application by email on 21 August 2017, the statutory time limit had already elapsed. The Tribunal therefore found that the application was irreceivable ratione temporis.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Imposition of disciplinary measure of a loss of five steps in grade and deferment of eligibility for consideration for promotion for a period of three years.

Legal Principle(s)

Time limits for formal contestation are to be strictly enforced (Mezoui 2010-惇蹋厙AT043, Al-Mulla 2013-惇蹋厙AT-394, Samuel-Thambiah 2013-惇蹋厙AT-385, Romman 2013惇蹋厙AT-308, Kissila 2014-惇蹋厙AT-470, Kazazi 2015-惇蹋厙AT-557).

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Achakzai

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement