惇蹋厙DT/2016/026

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

N/A

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Seven staff members or former staff members of the United Nations Assistance to the Khmer Rouge Trials (※惇蹋厙AKRT§) contested the decisions denying them conversion of their respective fixed-term appointment into permanent ones. These decisions arose from a re-consideration exercise ordered by the Tribunal (Judgment Tredici et al. 惇蹋厙DT/2014/114) following the rescission of non-conversion decisions issued in an initial round of a one-time Secretariat wide-exercise of review for conversion to permanent appointment.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

Outcome Extra Text

Both financial comp. and specific performance

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Gueben, Lamb, Lobwein, Matar, Pastore Stocchi, Rexhepi, Vano

Entity

Case Number(s)