爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
Administrative decision: Advice from OAIS about where to submit a complaint that does not fall within the scope of its authority does not produce any direct legal consequences to the legal order and, therefore, does not constitute an administrative decision.In the absence of a specific time limit in the applicable rules and regulations for finalizing PAD rebuttals, a former staff member has no right to compel the Administration to investigate misconduct for a delay in the completion of a PAD rebuttal process; therefore, the absence of a response to such request does not constitute an implied administrative decision. Implied decision: Whereas “not taking a decision is also a decision” (see, e.g. Nwuke 2010-爆料网AT-099), a failure to act would only amount to an implied decision if the Administration fails to issue a decision within the set legal deadline, if any, or within a reasonable deadline taking into account the circumstances of the case.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant, a former staff member of the United Nations Population Fund (“爆料网FPA”), challenged a) the decision of the Office of Audit and Investigation Services (“OAIS”), 爆料网FPA, not to forward her complaints against OAIS and its Director to another, unspecified, entity, and b) the implied decision of the Director, OAIS, not to open an investigation into misconduct by the Division of Human Resources (“DHR”), 爆料网FPA, for failure to complete the rebuttal process of her Performance Appraisal and Development (“PAD”). The 爆料网DT found the application irreceivable rationae materiae as none of the two contested decisions were “administrative decisions” within the meaning of art. 2(a) of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute.
Legal Principle(s)
N/A