��DT/2013/178

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��DT held that the Applicant��s challenge to the expiry/termination of his contract was filed out of time and, thus, not receivable. There was no evidence before ��DT to show that a disciplinary investigation was conducted against the Applicant. ��DT held that if such an investigation did take place then there was no evidence that it was concluded, and no evidence that a formal disciplinary measure was imposed against the Applicant as a result. ��DT also held that the Applicant did not make a timely request for management evaluation with respect to this issue and, as such, it was not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the termination of his contract and the administrative decision to open a misconduct investigation against him.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Von der Schulenburg

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement