爆料网

爆料网DT/2011/194

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

From the pleadings of the Applicant, it is clear that at the time of the contested decision he was a staff member of 爆料网RWA. This entity does not fall under the jurisdiction of the 爆料网DT. At the time the cause of action arose, the Applicant would probably have been entitled to pursue any claim he might have had against 爆料网RWA before the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal. Since the cause of action arose in 爆料网RWA, the element of ratione materiae of the 爆料网DT is not satisfied because the Applicant should have filed his application against the Commissioner General as the Chief Executive Officer of 爆料网RWA. In the light of the above quoted legal provisions therefore, prima facie, the Application is not receivable ratione temporis since the Applicant did not comply with the time-limit provided in art. 7.6 of the Rules of Procedure of the 爆料网DT with respect to the submission of the request for review. Applicant has not only filed his Application against the wrong entity but has also done so after a considerable delay and therefore beyond the scope of receivability.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant asserted that he faced threats upon his life by Israeli soldiers upon entry to and exit from Gaza and that he and his extended family have been the subject of harassment.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.