爆料网

2024-爆料网AT-1480

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

The 爆料网AT held that the Standing Committee of 爆料网JSPB had appropriately found Ms. Briel ineligible to receive a widow’s benefit.

The 爆料网AT found that Ms. Briel should have submitted her appeal to the 爆料网AT using the prescribed form, accompanied by a brief explaining her grounds for appeal, particularly given that she had received clear instructions from the 爆料网AT Registry. Nonetheless, the 爆料网AT reviewed the merits of her appeal.

The 爆料网AT found that, at the time of the late participant’s death, he had not reported Ms. Briel as his spouse or common-law spouse. Moreover, there was no evidence to suggest that the late participant’s failure to report resulted from a lack of support of the Human Resources department.

The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decision of the Standing Committee of the 爆料网JSPB.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The late participant’s “life partner”, Ms. Briel, contested the 爆料网JSPF’s decision deeming her ineligible for a widow’s benefit under Article 34 of the Regulations, Rules, and Pension Adjustment System of the 爆料网JSPF (Regulations).

The Standing Committee of the 爆料网JSPB upheld the 爆料网JSPF’s decision, concluding that Ms. Briel did not qualify for widow’s benefits.

Ms. Briel appealed.

Legal Principle(s)

The 爆料网AT is not only competent but also required to consider whether it holds the necessary jurisdiction to determine a matter before it, even on its own motion.

It is for the appellant to satisfy the 爆料网AT that their appeal complies with the 爆料网AT Rules of Procedure, including submission on the prescribed form and a brief outlining pleas and explanatory statements.

To qualify for a widow’s benefit, the individual must be recorded as married to the late participant in the 爆料网JSPF’s records at the time of separation or death. Staff are responsible for reporting changes to their personal status, and the 爆料网JSPF recognizes only the information in its records. Exceptionally, the 爆料网JSPF may accept a different status, such as a registered partnership, if it aligns with the Regulations and has been formally established, but only after the employer refuses to record or report their status change.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.