爆料网

爆料网JSPF Administrative Rules

  • Rule B.1
  • Rule B.2
  • Rule B.3
  • Rule F.1
  • Rule I.1
  • Rule J.1
  • Rule J.2
  • Rule K.4
  • Rule K.7(a)
  • Section B
  • Section J
  • Section K
  • Section K5
    • Showing 1 - 10 of 15
    2026-爆料网AT-1628, Elizabeth George

    The 爆料网AT found that Ms. George submitted her request to revert to the US dollar track system on 4 August 2015 and the Administration rejected it on 10 November 2015.Despite that clear communication, the former staff member continued to exchange correspondence with the Administration seeking reconsideration of the decision for almost nine years.She waited until 9 April 2024 before submitting her request for review to the Standing Committee.As it was filed beyond the statutory time limit of ninety days of receipt of notification of the contested decision, the 爆料网AT held that her request was...

    2025-爆料网AT-1534-Corr.1, Dionette Pino Genayas

    The 爆料网AT noted that months after the death of the participant in the Fund, the Appellant had produced Pens.A/2 forms purporting to change the designation of the beneficiary of the residual settlement, executed by a thumbprint and not the participant’s signature. The 爆料网AT also noted the medical evidence of signs of the participant’s dementia.

    The 爆料网AT found that the Appellant had provided no evidence to support the contention that the participant’s mental capacity had improved by the time of thumbprinting the later forms. The 爆料网AT held that the Fund had not erred when it found those forms...

    2024-爆料网AT-1480, Mirjam Briel

    The 爆料网AT held that the Standing Committee of 爆料网JSPB had appropriately found Ms. Briel ineligible to receive a widow’s benefit.

    The 爆料网AT found that Ms. Briel should have submitted her appeal to the 爆料网AT using the prescribed form, accompanied by a brief explaining her grounds for appeal, particularly given that she had received clear instructions from the 爆料网AT Registry. Nonetheless, the 爆料网AT reviewed the merits of her appeal.

    The 爆料网AT found that, at the time of the late participant’s death, he had not reported Ms. Briel as his spouse or common-law spouse. Moreover, there was no evidence to...

    2024-爆料网AT-1447, Iyofe Christine Isasi

    The 爆料网AT held that Mr. Kankwenda, a late participant in the 爆料网JSPF, married another individual, Ms. M.T., in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in 1971. This fact, which Ms. Isasi herself did not contest, was supported by a marriage certificate and was consistent with the information regarding the dates of birth of Mr. Kankwenda’s children and the identities of their mothers. The 爆料网AT highlighted that Ms. Isasi admitted that the two marriage certificates she submitted after Mr. Kankwenda’s death, purportedly showing their marriage on 17 January 1971, were falsified, undermining her...

    2023-爆料网AT-1365, Polycarp Ambe-Niba

    The 爆料网AT considered an appeal by the participant in the Fund.

    The 爆料网AT found that the facts suggest that the participant’s withdrawal settlement funds were paid into a bank account which had not been opened by him. At the same time, there were unanswered questions as to how the participant had bank statements and cancelled cheques from this account if he had not opened it. In addition, given the mismatch between the participant’s name and the name of the holder of the bank account, there was no explanation as to why the wire transfer had been allowed to proceed and had not been rejected.

    The...

    2023-爆料网AT-1326, Conforte Uwingabire Banyanga

    The 爆料网AT denied Ms. Banyanga’s appeal and affirmed the decision of the Standing Committee. The 爆料网AT found that Ms. Banyanga had not adequately explained the inconsistencies between her own personal information and the information submitted by Mr. Mbirange regarding his reported spouse (including that the name “Banyanga” did not appear in the documentation that Mr. Mbirange provided about his spouse).

    The 爆料网AT also rejected Ms. Banyanga’s reliance on the marriage certificate that she submitted, which showed a purported date of marriage in 1997. The 爆料网AT observed that Mr. Mbirange entered...

    2023-爆料网AT-1323, Elena Korotaeva

    The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    The 爆料网AT first held that the 爆料网DT erred in law in retroactively applying WMO Staff Rule 193.3(c) when it examined her right to a termination indemnity. At the time the impugned decision was taken, only the 2019 WMO Staff Regulations and Rules were in force and should have been applied. The 爆料网DT made an error in applying the 2020 law based on the Secretary-General’s submission of the wrong version of the WMO Regulations and Rules to the 爆料网DT.

    The 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT's finding that the Administration’s response to a request for management evaluation is not a...

    2010-爆料网AT-016, Tebeyne

    爆料网AT considered the appeal and affirmed 爆料网JSPF’s decision. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网JSPF submitted credible evidence that demonstrated that the Cameroon divorce decree was invalid and that the deceased at no time commenced proceedings to dissolve his marriage to his first wife apart from the USA divorce proceedings, which were terminated by his death. In drawing this conclusion, 爆料网AT found it unnecessary to address the additional reliefs sought by the Appellant. 爆料网AT accordingly affirmed 爆料网JSPF’s decision to award the widow’s benefit to the former staff member’s first wife and denied all reliefs...

    2010-爆料网AT-004, Neville

    爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal and affirmed the decisions of 爆料网JSPB Standing Committee. 爆料网AT found that the Appellant’s first ground of appeal had no merit, noting that the Appellant had prior notice of her separation and could have exercised her right to restore her participation prior to the time of her separation in accordance with Section F. 1 of the Pension Fund’s Administrative Rules, which she failed to do. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网JSPF Standing Committee had no discretion to make an exception in this case and the Standing Committee’s decision not to restore the Appellant’s prior...

    2013-爆料网AT-348, Sidell

    爆料网AT noted that: the Sidells were negligent in not reporting their marriage before their separation from service; Mr Sidell notified 爆料网JSPF in October 2003 of his marriage to Mrs Sidell and 爆料网JSPF requested him to provide his original marriage certificate, which he did; and 爆料网JSPF did not follow up with Mr Sidell about the matter. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网JSPF, by remaining silent, created a reasonable expectation on the part of the Sidells that Mr Sidell’s pension record was corrected and that his marriage to Mr Sidell was recognised by 爆料网JSPF. 爆料网AT held that, in the circumstances, it was...