2022-��AT-1275

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The ��AT held that the supposedly unknown facts that Mr. Al Dirawi detailed in his application for revision of the ��AT Judgment focus on findings and conclusions in the ��AT Judgment with which he disagrees. Notably, these matters were considered in the original appeal and Mr. Al Dirawi basically submits a second appeal for a reassessment of the facts in his case, a remedy which is not available to the parties once the Appeals Tribunal has issued a final judgment. The ��AT thus held that Mr. Al Dirawi's application was not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Mr. Al Dirawi submitted an application for revision of Judgment No. 2021-��AT-1158, in which the ��AT affirmed the ��RWA DT judgment that upheld his dismissal for serious misconduct.

Legal Principle(s)

Any application which seeks a review of a final judgment rendered by the Appeals Tribunal can only succeed if it fulfils the strict and exceptional criteria established by Article 11 of the Statute of the Appeals Tribunal.

Pursuant to Article 11, an applicant must show or identify the decisive facts that at the time of the Appeals Tribunal��s judgment were unknown to both the Appeals Tribunal and the party applying for revision; that such ignorance was not due to the negligence of the applicant; that the facts identified would have been decisive in reaching the decision; and that the decisive facts existed at the time when the judgment was given and were discovered subsequently.

An application for revision of a judgment which does not meet the statutory prerequisites, cannot be a collateral means of attack on the judgment or allowed to be a second right of final appeal.

Outcome

Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

Outcome Extra Text

Application for revision of judgment is dismissed.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Hussam Abd AlRhman Al Dirawi

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement