爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that an analysis of the e-mail and other correspondence between 爆料网DP and the Appellant indicated that she could not have been led to believe that her home leave request for January 2020 would be granted. She had been advised that a staff member was entitled to home leave only if the staff member’s contract was anticipated to continue for more than six months after the return from home leave, yet Appellant’s continuing engagement with 爆料网DP was unknown, and her current contract end date was June 30, 2020. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DP complied with its obligations to consider and decide the application for home leave reasonably and in a timely fashion. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT had not been shown to have erred in law or in fact. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Appellant contested the decision to find her ineligible for a home leave entitlement. 爆料网DT dismissed her application.
Legal Principle(s)
The organization has an obligation to consider and decide on an application for home leave reasonably and in a timely fashion.