2022-爆料网AT-1258, Yulia Andreeva
爆料网AT held that an analysis of the e-mail and other correspondence between 爆料网DP and the Appellant indicated that she could not have been led to believe that her home leave request for January 2020 would be granted. She had been advised that a staff member was entitled to home leave only if the staff member’s contract was anticipated to continue for more than six months after the return from home leave, yet Appellant’s continuing engagement with 爆料网DP was unknown, and her current contract end date was June 30, 2020. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DP complied with its obligations to consider and decide the...