爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that the decision of 爆料网DT that the application in relation to the non-renewal decision was moot because the non-renewal decision never materialised was correct. 爆料网AT held that the non-renewal decision was overtaken by the Appellant’s separation for health reasons and that the Appellant had not challenged the actual decision that ultimately resulted in the termination of her employment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had no obligation to consider the merits of the superseded decision once it correctly found that the application was moot. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the decision to separate the Appellant due to incapacitation superseded the non-renewal decision and that the application was moot. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly concluded that it could not order compensation. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to show any error on the part of 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT Judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Appellant contested the decision not to renew her fixed term appointment. 爆料网DT dismissed her application.
Legal Principle(s)
An application to 爆料网DT will be moot where the impugned administrative decision did not take effect because it was rescinded or superseded by subsequent actions of the Administration; in such cases, the 爆料网DT will lack subject-matter jurisdiction to examine the merits of the case. Compensation cannot be awarded when no illegality has been established.