2021-��AT-1093

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that ��DT��s finding that the challenge to the decision by the Secretary-General not to waive Mr Dolgopolov��s immunity was not receivable on the ground that it was an executive/political decision is incorrect. ��AT held, however, that ��DT was correct in finding Mr Dolgopolov��s applications not receivable, but for other reasons. ��AT held that Mr Dolgopolov��s applications were not receivable, because he did not refer the impugned decision regarding his request to sue the Ukrainian Ambassador to management evaluation, and the decision in respect of G-4 visa restrictions imposed by the Government of the United States was without direct legal impact on his contract of employment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

i) Decision to not waive Mr. Dolgopolov��s functional immunity for the purposes of taking legal action against the Ukrainian Ambassador and Ukrinform, and the rejection of his request to receive compensation for the loss of opportunity to take such legal action for alleged moral harm; ii) the decision to not waive his functional immunity for the purposes of taking legal action against the Government of the United States regarding restrictions placed by that Government on G-4 visa holders who are Russian nationals, and the rejection of his request to be compensated for allegedly suffering from such restrictions and for allegedly moral harm.

Legal Principle(s)

��AT��s decision in Kozul-Wright is not applicable to the facts of the case, because here Mr Dogolpolov is not raising functional immunity to escape personal liability on the basis of his status as a United Nations official. He is seeking to vindicate his rights in a local court, for which he does not need the permission of the Secretary-General. The appeal against the decision to prohibit Mr Dogolpolov from suing the Government of the United States regarding G-4 visa restrictions imposed on Russian nationals working for the United Nations in New York is not receivable because it was without direct legal impact on his contract of employment.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

Appeal dismissed and Judgment No. ��DT/2020/113 affirmed.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Leonid Dolgopolov

Entity

Case Number(s)

2020-1412

Tribunal

��AT

Registry

New York

Date of Judgement

19 Mar 2021