爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held the staff member’s appeal of the 爆料网DT Judgment was defective as it failed to identify any of the five grounds of appeal set out in Article 2.1 of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT ruled that the appellant had failed to explain why the dismissal of his application by the 爆料网DT was erroneous. Additionally, 爆料网AT also held that it found no error in the practice of the 爆料网DT to dismiss an application for want of prosecution when there is sufficient reason to assume that the applicant is no longer interested in the litigation, based on Article 19 (Case management) and Article 36 (Procedural matters not covered in the rules of procedure) of the 爆料网DT Rules of Procedure. 爆料网AT, however, cautioned that great care should be taken in exercising this power and it must be done only in instances where there is evidence that an applicant has failed to meet his obligations.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
爆料网DT dismissed the application of a former staff member for want of prosecution. The staff member had challenged the Administration’s imposition of the disciplinary measure of separation from service for engaging in serious misconduct. The staff member had been directed on three separate occasions by the 爆料网DT (10 June 2020, 15 June 2020, and 18 June 2020) to make the necessary submissions for the continuation of his case so it can proceed to a hearing on the merits, but he failed to do so, leading the tribunal to the conclusion that he was no longer interested in the pursuit of his; proceedings and had abandoned his case. A day after the Judgment dismissing the case (30 June 2020), the staff member contacted the Registry asking the tribunal to reconsider the Judgment. The tribunal ordered the staff member to provide any justifications for his failure to respond to the previous communications and orders, and the latter explained that he understood the Registry’s communication of 18 March 2020 to be a suspension of the hearing until the COVID-19 crisis had abated. Not finding his explanation compelling, the 爆料网DT, on 7 July 2020, by Order No. 114 (NY/2020) rejected the staff member’s request to reconsider its judgment on dismissal for want of prosecution.
Legal Principle(s)
An appeal must identify any of the five grounds of appeal set out in Article 2.1 of the 爆料网AT Statute, explaining why the lower tribunal was in error. There is no fault with the practice and jurisprudence of the Dispute Tribunal to dismiss an application for want of prosecution when there is sufficient reason to assume that the applicant is no longer interested in the litigation. This power should be exercised only where there is sufficient evidence that an applicant has failed to meet his obligations to pursue his case.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
爆料网AT dismissed the appeal finding that the appellant did not identify any errors in the judgment appealed. 爆料网AT also found no fault in the practice of 爆料网DT to dismiss an application for want of prosecution.