爆料网

2020-爆料网AT-979

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT considered an appeal of Order No. 079. 爆料网AT held that, regardless of whether 爆料网DT may have committed an error of law, fact, or procedure, Article 2(2) of the 爆料网DT Statute precluded an appeal to 爆料网AT if 爆料网DT acted within its jurisdiction or competence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT acted within its jurisdiction or competence. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT Order.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew his fixed-term appointment beyond its expiration as a result of a retrenchment exercise and submitted an application for suspension of action. In Order No. 079 (NBI/2019), the 爆料网DT declined to suspend the administrative decision on grounds that the impugned administrative decision was not prima facie unlawful.

Legal Principle(s)

Appeals of 爆料网DT decisions on suspensions of action are only receivable before 爆料网AT if 爆料网DT, in the adjudication of such applications, clearly exceeded its jurisdiction or competence.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.