爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered two appeals, one against Order No. 103 (NBI/2012) and one against judgment No. 爆料网DT/2012/116. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not established any excess of jurisdiction or competence on the part of 爆料网DT; rather, his claims addressed the merits of the 爆料网DT decision. 爆料网AT noted that even if the 爆料网DT had erred in law or fact and as also alleged in the case, committed an error of procedure, this did not instance any excess of jurisdiction or competence on its part such as would entitle the Appellant to bypass the exception to the right to appeal set out in Article 2(2) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the appeals were not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
爆料网DT order and judgment: In the context of a dispute over the appointment of another individual to a post for which he had applied, the Applicant submitted a request for a suspension of action. In Order No. 103 (NBI/2012), 爆料网DT rejected the request. In judgment No. 爆料网DT/2012/116, 爆料网DT set out the reasons as to why the request for suspension of action had not been granted.
Legal Principle(s)
Appeals from the 爆料网DT on suspension of action decisions will be receivable only if 爆料网DT, in adjudicating on such applications, exceeded its competence or jurisdiction.