爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered an application for execution of judgment No. 2018-爆料网AT-873 by Ms Belkhabbaz, requesting that 爆料网AT should order specific performance remedies against the individual against whom she had pursued her complaint. 爆料网AT held that, under Section 5. 18(c) of ST/SGB/2008/5, the Assistant Secretary-General of the Office of Human Resources Management (ASG/OHRM) had the discretion to decide whether or not to institute disciplinary measures, managerial actions, or administrative actions. 爆料网AT held that the managerial action upon which the ASG/OHRM decided complied with 爆料网AT’s direction in the previous judgment and thus executed said judgment. 爆料网AT held that there was no basis to grant any of the remedies requested by Ms Belkhabbaz. 爆料网AT held that Ms Belkhabbaz was only entitled to the remedies ordered in the previous 爆料网AT judgment. The Secretary-General fully and properly executed the previous 爆料网AT judgment. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for execution.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
In judgment No. 2018-爆料网AT-873, 爆料网AT ordered the Secretary-General to act in accordance with Section 5. 18(c) of ST/SGB/2008/5 regarding applicable disciplinary procedures with regard to the individual against whom the staff member had pursued a complaint, and then to inform the staff member of the outcome of the investigation and the action taken. The staff member was subsequently informed that the individual had separated from the 爆料网 and that a note would be placed in his official status file indicating that the matter was subject to further review should he seek to re-join the Organisation. The staff member filed an application for execution of judgment, requesting that 爆料网AT should order specific performance remedies against the individual against whom she had pursued her complaint.
Legal Principle(s)
An applicant may not seek to use an application for execution of judgment to obtain additional remedies that were not granted in the judgment.