2019-��AT-965

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that the Appellant simply put forward several general complaints related to the alleged merits of her case but did not argue that the judgment was defective or that ��RWA DT committed an error in deciding that her application was not receivable. ��AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the ��RWA DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to grant her a promotion after she had requested one. ��RWA DT dismissed the Applicant��s application as not receivable ratione materiae on the grounds that her application failed to articulate a contested administrative decision and not receivable ratione temporis as her application had been filed more than a year after the deadline.

Legal Principle(s)

On appeal, an appellant has the burden to establish that the ��DT judgment is defective; it is not sufficient for an appellant to state he or she disagrees with the outcome or repeat arguments submitted before ��DT.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Alkarazoun

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement