2019-��AT-904

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that the Appellant did not fall under any of the categories of potential applicants and had no legal standing before ��DT. ��AT held that, accordingly, the Appellant had no standing before ��AT and therefore ��AT had no competence to address the merits of her claims. ��AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, an individual contractor, contested the decision not to include her in the Protection Officer Talent Pool. ��DT summarily rejected the application on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction ratione personae to adjudicate her claim.

Legal Principle(s)

Individual contractors do not have standing before ��DT.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Prempeh

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement