2018-��AT-848

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT denied the Appellant��s request for an oral hearing and held that it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case, as required by Article 18(1) of the RoP. ��AT held that Toure is binding precedent on ��DT as it applied to the Appellant��s case and found no fault with ��DT��s judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to abolish his post. ��DT referred to Toure as precedent. ��DT held that the Applicant had no legitimate expectancy of extension of his appointment and that under the applicable budgetary rules, the abolition of the Regional Advisor posts did not require prior approval by the COM or the General Assembly and constituted a lawful exercise of managerial discretion. ��DT dismissed the application in its entirety.

Legal Principle(s)

Under Toure, there is no expectancy of renewal of fixed-term and temporary contracts.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Oguntola

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement