爆料网

2016-爆料网AT-708

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT held that the impugned Order ceased to have any legal effect when the management evaluation decision was issued. 爆料网AT held that the issuance of the management evaluation had rendered the Order under appeal moot. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal in its entirety.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant filed a request for suspension of action of the Secretary-General’s decision to select an alternative internal candidate for the position, for which the Applicant had applied. 爆料网DT issued an Order suspending the selection decision pending management evaluation pursuant to Article 2. 2 of the 爆料网DT Statute. The Secretary-General appealed. The Secretary-General later filed a “Motion for Consideration” requesting 爆料网AT to determine whether the matter fell within the exception of the mootness doctrine.

Legal Principle(s)

In the 爆料网 system of administration of justice, 爆料网AT was established to pass judgment on existing disputes, but not to give interpretations of the law where there are no disputes before it.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Finniss
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type