爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered a request for revision of judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-297. 爆料网AT noted that the application for revision was filed more than six months beyond the time limit. 爆料网AT held that the application for revision was not receivable ratione temporis. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Previous 爆料网AT judgment: Mr Likuyani was separated from service without notice after he was found to have filed false claims for reimbursement of medical bills and to have made personal international phone calls from an official line without authorisation. He applied to the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal for revision of its judgment No. 976, which was transferred to the 爆料网DT. Mr Likuyani filed an application with 爆料网DT for revision of 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal judgment No. 976. 爆料网DT found that the application was not receivable. On appeal to 爆料网AT, in judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-297, 爆料网AT found that the application was not receivable.
Legal Principle(s)
An application for a revision of a judgment must be made within 30 calendar days of the discovery of the fact and within one year of the date of the judgment.