爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT dismissed the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing. On the merits, 爆料网AT noted that he argued the same arguments that he put before 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网RWA DT gave careful and fair consideration to the Appellant’s arguments and weighed them against the facts of the case. 爆料网AT found no fault with 爆料网RWA DT’s decision and held that the Appellant did not demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT erred in fact or law. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decisions to declare his functions as Trades Instructor, Radio and Television Maintenance redundant and to deny his request to be transferred to the post of Recreation Officer. 爆料网RWA DT found that no extraneous factors, maladministration and/or breach of due process tainted the contested decision and dismissed the application.
Legal Principle(s)
It is not sufficient for an appellant merely to state that they disagree with the 爆料网DT’s decision and to repeat the arguments submitted before the first instance court. 爆料网DT has broad discretion to determine the weight it attaches to the evidence before it. An appellant who appeals a