2013-��AT-299

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that there was no merit in the appeal as ��DT correctly concluded that applications to ��DT were only receivable if the applicant had previously submitted the contested administrative decision for management evaluation and that management evaluation was a mandatory first step. ��AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the alleged decision not to allow a rebuttal process to be carried out in accordance with the applicable norms. ��DT rejected the application as not receivable, as the impugned decision had not been submitted for management evaluation.

Legal Principle(s)

Requesting management evaluation is a mandatory first step in the appeals process.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Gehr

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement