2010-��AT-086

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT considered a (second) appeal by the Appellant. Taking into account that neither ��DT nor ��AT had been presented with any submission on the merits of the case, ��AT ordered the Appellant to file a concise statement identifying the precise nature of his claim within 15 days. ��AT allowed the appeal and set aside the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested, inter alia, his non-promotion. In judgment No. ��DT/2010/048, ��DT found that the Applicant was given several opportunities to comply with Order No. 28 and ordered that his consolidated claim be struck out in its entirety.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Atogo

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement