爆料网

2010-爆料网AT-073

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT held that it was open to 爆料网DT to consider the preliminary issue of whether the Appellant had legal standing even to challenge the administrative decision not to advertise the vacancies. 爆料网AT held there was no error in the 爆料网DT’s decision that the Appellant was not entitled to contest the administrative decision since he was not an eligible candidate for any of the vacant posts. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had no stake in the administrative decision as his rights and terms were not affected by the fact that the posts were not advertised. 爆料网AT held that the appeal failed on the ground that the Appellant had no standing to challenge the administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that no error in fact or law was made. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant sought to challenge the lack of advertisement of certain vacant posts, which he argued denied him the opportunity to apply for them. 爆料网DT dismissed the application as non-receivable for lack of legal standing.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Pellet
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type