爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
In considering the appeal brought forth by the Appellant, 爆料网AT preliminarily held that the 爆料网RWA JAB erred in finding that the appeal was not receivable due to late filing; 爆料网AT held that it was evident the JAB appeal was filed on time. With regard to the substance of the appeal, 爆料网AT held that it was within 爆料网RWA’s power and discretion to refuse the Appellant’s reinstatement since it had already filled his position. 爆料网AT affirmed 爆料网RWA’s position that there was no error in refusing the Appellant’s reinstatement and dismissed the appeal.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
爆料网RWA JAB decision: The Applicant submitted a letter of resignation for his post but shortly after indicated that he wished to withdraw his letter and be reinstated. 爆料网RWA had already filled his post and refused to reinstate him. The Applicant appealed to the 爆料网RWA Joint Appeals Board (JAB), which submitted its report to the 爆料网RWA Commissioner-General. The 爆料网RWA Commissioner-General adopted the JAB’s recommendation and affirmed the decision.
Legal Principle(s)
An employer has no obligation to reinstate an employee who previously resigned.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.