爆料网

爆料网RWA

Showing 231 - 240 of 274
2020-爆料网AT-1055, Zaqqout

爆料网AT held that all of the Appellant’s grounds of appeal failed, except for his challenge to the 爆料网RWA decision not to renew or extend the Appellant’s limited duration contract beyond its final extension, for the simple reason that those several decisions to extend his contract advantaged him by adding, in total, six months to his contract. On the issue of the Appellant’s non-renewal or final extension, 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网RWA DT’s reasoning and that 爆料网RWA was justified in deciding not to renew or extend his employment, noting that 爆料网RWA faced a massive financial shortfall...

2020-爆料网AT-1061, Abu Osba

As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT held that an oral hearing was not necessary and would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case as the Appellant had not provided grounds for an oral hearing beyond seeking to confront the witnesses and comment on existing evidence. Whilst 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to identify any errors of law or fact by 爆料网RWA DT as required under Art 2(1) 爆料网AT Statute, 爆料网AT did go on to consider his appeal as he was not represented. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had correctly applied the standard of review for disciplinary cases and that 爆料网RWA DT’s exercise...

2020-爆料网AT-1047, Orabi

爆料网AT considered an appeal of judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2019/070 by the Commissioner-General of 爆料网RWA. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not commit any error when it concluded that 爆料网RWA had failed to consider the Applicant’s personal and humanitarian reasons in the impugned decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT correctly concluded that relevant matters (personal and humanitarian reasons) had been ignored in the exercise of the Commissioner-General’s discretion. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

2020-爆料网AT-1036, Mansour

爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT failed to address some issues before it, in respect of which the Appellant is entitled to a reasoned decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in declining the Appellant’s implicit request for a hearing in person, at least without having considered it and given reasons. 爆料网AT held that the termination of the Appellant’s appointment could not be assessed as hasty, premature, or arbitrary, with particular reference to the Medical Board process. 爆料网AT held that any opportunity of the Appellant’s appointment to that vacancy had therefore passed, irrespective of her...

2020-爆料网AT-1022, El Shanti

爆料网AT considered two appeals (consolidated) by Mr ElShanti of judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2019/051 and judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2019/065 respectively. On the consolidation of the cases, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had broad discretion in managing its cases and that it would only intervene in clear cases of denial of due process of law affecting a party’s right to produce evidence. Accordingly, 爆料网AT rejected Mr ElShanti’s arguments against consolidation. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to Mr ElShanti’s claims that the characterization of the impugned administrative decision was incorrect, noting that 爆料网RWA...

2020-爆料网AT-1020, Dibs

爆料网AT considered an application for execution of judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-798 by Mr. Dibs. 爆料网AT granted in part the application for execution of judgment and ordered 爆料网RWA to fully execute the judgment within 30 calendar days, advising that failure to comply with the deadline would result in a finding of manifest abuse of process, the award of costs, and potentially, a referral for accountability. 爆料网AT considered that the request for moral and pecuniary damages did not fall within the scope of the application.

2020-爆料网AT-1019, Houran et al

爆料网AT held that the Appellants failed to specifically identify the errors allegedly committed by the 爆料网RWA DT and therefore the appeals were defective for that reason but considered the appeals given that the appellants were not legally represented. 爆料网AT held that any error on a finding of fact of when the Appellants receive notification of the administrative decision did not result in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that whether the administrative decision was the expressed verbal communication of the denial to provide compensation or was implied from the refusal or failure to...

2020-爆料网AT-1018, Abu Ouda et al

爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT exercised its discretion lawfully to consolidate the cases. 爆料网AT held that the impugned decisions were taken in good faith and on a reasonable basis. 爆料网AT held that there was a bona fide reason to restructure and that it was operationally rational not to renew the Limited Duration Contracts at the time. 爆料网AT held that the Appellants' argument with regard to their acquired rights being violated was without merit. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2020-爆料网AT-1029, El Madhoun

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT correctly concluded that 爆料网RWA had failed to provide sufficiently clear, precise, and intelligible reasoning and had not acted lawfully, reasonably, and fairly. 爆料网AT held that once a staff member was eligible for EVR in accordance with paragraph 8 of Area Staff Rule 109. 2, paragraph 9 became applicable and its text was clear. 爆料网AT held that Mr. El Madhoun was eligible for EVR and it was not established that budgetary constraints were either ground for rejecting his request for EVR or for not withdrawing his notice...