爆料网

爆料网RWA

Showing 181 - 190 of 274
2017-爆料网AT-790, Anshasi

爆料网AT held that it was not persuaded that 爆料网RWA DT erred in procedure or otherwise exceeded its jurisdiction such as to warrant reversal of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网AT held that there was no reason to differ from 爆料网RWA DT’s findings that 爆料网RWA had no reason to refer the Appellant to a medical board and that the issue was not relevant as the Appellant did not contest that he was unfit for service, nor did he allege that his health problems were related to his service with 爆料网RWA. 爆料网AT further noted that, as the Appellant was over sixty years of age, he was not eligible for a disability...

2017-爆料网AT-789, Barakat

爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not complied with his obligations under Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that there were no errors of law, fact, or procedure in the 爆料网RWA DT judgment. 爆料网AT held that under the relevant Circular, the Administration only had a duty to consider the Appellant’s request to be transferred to a certain compound, but not his wish to be transferred to a certain school located in that compound. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment.

2017-爆料网AT-788, Soliman

爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in law and/or fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision when it found that 爆料网RWA’s decision not to renew the Appellant’s fixed-term appointment at the end of the probationary period was a lawful exercise of its discretion. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT correctly found that a performance-related justification for the non-renewal was properly given in the form of his electronic Performance Evaluation Report. 爆料网AT held that the irregularities in the assessment of the Appellant’s performance were not sufficiently substantial or consequential so as to rebut...

2017-爆料网AT-787, Auda

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the staff member and an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT upheld both 爆料网DT’s finding that the decision to close the investigation was improper as well as 爆料网DT’s refusal to order rescission of that decision on account of the subject of the investigation having separated from the Organisation. 爆料网AT, however, vacated 爆料网DT’s moral damages award on the grounds that the staff member did not present any evidence, apart from his own unsworn testimony to support the claim. 爆料网AT held that “generally speaking, the testimony of an applicant alone without corroboration by...

2017-爆料网AT-779, Abu Hweidi et al.

Ar爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT’s decision not to hold an oral hearing was a shortcoming since the parties had not agreed to the case being decided on the papers and the facts needed to be established by witnesses and/or further documentary evidence. On the question of bias and its possible bearing on the outcome of the selection process, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT should have engaged in a thorough examination of the facts, rather than drawing an inference. 爆料网AT held that the inference drawn by 爆料网RWA DT, that it was realistic to conclude that not all of the posts could be filled by suitable candidates...

2017-爆料网AT-773, Ali

爆料网AT found no error in the 爆料网RWA DT finding that the application was not receivable ratione temporis. 爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s contention that 爆料网RWA DT erred in that it examined the timeliness of his application sua sponte, without it having been raised by the Respondent, holding that the competence of 爆料网RWA DT to review the observance of the statutory deadlines for filing an application can be exercised even if the parties or the administrative authorities do not raise the issue because it constitutes a matter of law and the 爆料网RWA DT Statute prevents 爆料网RWA DT from receiving a case which...

2017-爆料网AT-771, Al-Mussader

爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not make any errors of law or fact in dismissing the Appellant’s application. 爆料网AT found no reason to differ from the conclusion of 爆料网RWA DT, that 爆料网RWA could not have considered the Appellant as having the requisite international experience. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT gave careful and fair consideration to the Appellant’s arguments regarding the required international experience for the post. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to discharge his burden of proving through clear and convincing evidence that he was denied a fair chance of selection. 爆料网AT held that the...

2017-爆料网AT-769, Haj Saleh

爆料网AT held that, in light of the undertaking the Appellant had signed agreeing to work on the relevant education programme at the remuneration rate determined by 爆料网RWA, his acceptance of that rate was not compatible with his subsequent claim for retroactive readjustments. 爆料网AT held that the extra and external activities as a lecturer for physical education did not have the consequence to modify the job duties or title of the Appellant’s post. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT properly treated the question of the Appellant’s additional work in light of PD A/3 related to the parallel education programme...

2017-爆料网AT-749, Ayoub

爆料网AT held that there was no evidence before it to support the contention that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law. 爆料网AT upheld the findings of 爆料网RWA DT that there was no evidence that the decision to abolish the Appellant’s post was arbitrary or capricious, motivated by prejudice or extraneous factors, or was flawed by procedural irregularity or error of law. 爆料网AT held that there was evidence of a process that was motivated by budgetary constraints as well as concerns about the effective management of a redundancy process. 爆料网AT found no procedural irregularity or any error in law on the part of 爆料网RWA DT...

2017-爆料网AT-748, Sharbaji

爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT’s finding. 爆料网AT held that no purpose would have been served by the conduct of an evaluation exercise for a post that was about to be or had been abolished. 爆料网AT accepted the 爆料网RWA DT’s finding that there was a genuine redundancy situation. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence before it to support the Appellant’s contention that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.