爆料网

爆料网RWA DT Statute

  • Article 10
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10(4)
  • Article 10(5)(a)
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11(4)
  • Article 11(5)
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 12.3
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 3
  • Article 4.7
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)
  • Article 8.1(d)(ii)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.2
    • Showing 51 - 60 of 127
    2014-爆料网AT-431, Mousa

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to establish any error in fact or law which would warrant the reversal of the 爆料网RWA DT judgment under appeal. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had correctly characterized the contested administrative decision subject to its judicial review as a demotion and subsequent transfer, which was taken after disciplinary proceedings. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had not erred when, after conducting an adequate review of the requirements for the adoption of a disciplinary measure, it concluded that there had been misconduct and that the sanction was legal and proportionate to...

    2014-爆料网AT-410, Igbinedion

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not act lawfully in issuing an order in direct contravention of the established 爆料网AT jurisprudence. However, 爆料网AT also held that parties before 爆料网DT must obey its binding decisions and that a decision by 爆料网DT remained legally valid until such time as 爆料网AT vacated it. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s refusal to comply with 爆料网DT’s order was vexatious. 爆料网AT reiterated its jurisprudence that the absence of compliance may merit contempt proceedings. 爆料网AT upheld the appeal in part.

    Accountability Referral: The 爆料网AT...

    2014-爆料网AT-406, Chahrour

    On the issue of receivability, 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网RWA DT had exceeded its competence or jurisdiction in summarily addressing sua sponte the issue of the receivability of the application when the Commissioner-General did not raise that issue in his reply. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s request for review of the contested decision was filed almost a year after he knew of the implied decision and was, therefore, untimely. 爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s contentions against the participation of the Commissioner-General in the proceedings and to file a...

    2014-爆料网AT-400, Tadonki

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing since the issues for decision had been clearly defined by the parties’ submissions. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had failed to persuade it that 爆料网DT erred on a question of fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that it was correct to conclude that the Administration had acted unlawfully when it did not renew the staff member’s appointment because there was not enough evidence to support a determination that the staff member had failed to perform his functions. 爆料网AT...

    2015-爆料网AT-606, Hayek

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT found that there were no exceptional circumstances to warrant the granting of the Appellant’s motion for leave to file a reply to the Commissioner-General’s answer and denied the motion. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA’s findings that the application was not receivable ratione temporis because it was filed more than three years after the receipt of the termination decision and that 爆料网RWA DT had no discretion to waive the regulatory time limit of three years, were unassailable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT correctly found that the application was not receivable ratione...

    2015-爆料网AT-594, El Saleh

    爆料网AT considered appeals of both judgment Nos. 爆料网RWA/DT/2014/026 (judgment on the merits) and 爆料网RWA/DT/2014/051 (judgment on revision). 爆料网AT held that the appeal against the judgment on the merits was filed out of time and was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the judgment on revision failed to identify a ground of appeal, expressed disagreement, and repeated arguments already considered and rejected by 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT held that the appeal constituted an impermissible attempt to reargue the merits of the case. 爆料网AT held that the fact upon which the Appellant had based his revision application did...

    2015-爆料网AT-587, Faraj

    爆料网AT had before it an appeal by the staff member limited to the award of compensation. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网RWA DT set the compensation in lieu of reinstatement award by calculating the sum the Appellant would have received for the remainder of his two-year contract, less the amount he received as salaries from other employers during the same period. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in this regard. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that in its assessment of compensation in lieu of reinstatement, 爆料网RWA DT was conscious of the Appellant’s claims for loss of opportunity. 爆料网AT held that, in view of...

    2015-爆料网AT-580, Kalil

    爆料网AT considered an appeal against Order No. 057 (爆料网RWA/DT/2014) and judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2014/027. 爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s request for confidentiality and for the redaction of his name from the 爆料网RWA DT judgment and affirmed 爆料网RWA DT’s reasoning. 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request to submit new evidence to 爆料网AT on the basis that the Appellant did not offer any explanation as to why he was precluded from filing them previously, exceptional circumstances did not exist, and its content would not have affected the decision of the case. 爆料网AT held that it was for 爆料网RWA DT to consider that it...

    2015-爆料网AT-579, Achkar

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to identify the grounds for his appeal and thus, the appeal was defective. 爆料网AT inferred that the Appellant claimed 爆料网RWA DT failed to exercise its jurisdiction. 爆料网AT held that the legal conclusion of 爆料网DT that the application before it was not receivable was unassailable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err when it did not discuss whether the case was an exceptional case for extending, waiving, or suspending the deadline for the filing of the application. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

    2015-爆料网AT-562, Birya

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to set up a fact-finding panel was not, in and of itself, a decision relating to the contractual rights of a staff member. 爆料网AT held that such a decision was preliminary in nature and irregularities in connection with that decision, including alleged delay in reaching that decision, may only be challenged in the context of an appeal after the conclusion of the entire process. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the application was receivable was without legal basis as was its award of compensation. 爆料网AT held that...