爆料网

爆料网JSPF Regulations

  • Annex I
  • Annex IV
  • Annex ll
  • Article 1
  • Article 1(l)
  • Article 1(q)
  • Article 1(v)
  • Article 10
  • Article 13
  • Article 2
  • Article 22
  • Article 22(b)
  • Article 22(c)
  • Article 24
  • Article 24(a)
  • Article 25
  • Article 25(b)(i)
  • Article 27
  • Article 28
  • Article 28(d)
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(e)
  • Article 30
  • Article 30(b)
  • Article 31
  • Article 31 (b) (ii)
  • Article 31(a)
  • Article 31(b)(i)
  • Article 32
  • Article 32(a)
  • Article 32(b)
  • Article 33
  • Article 33(a)
  • Article 34
  • Article 35
  • Article 35(b)(i)
  • Article 35ter
  • Article 38
  • Article 4(b)
  • Article 4(c)
  • Article 40
  • Article 44
  • Article 45
  • Article 48
  • Article 48(a)
  • Article 49(b)
  • Article 50
  • Article 50(b)
  • Article 53
  • Article 54
  • Article 6
  • Article 6(a)
  • Former Regulation 31
  • Former Regulation 35
  • Regulation 1(n)
  • Regulation 30(a)
  • Section H.5
  • Section K
  • Section K.1
  • Section K.5
  • Section K.8(a)
  • Section K.8(b)
    • Showing 21 - 30 of 77
    2022-爆料网AT-1198, Mehmet Selman Ergüden

    爆料网AT held that Mr. Ergüden’s decision when he elected to be on the local-currency track was irreversible unless the pre-conditions as set out in Paragraph 31(b) and 38(e) of the PAS were met. 爆料网AT held that Mr. Ergüden did not meet those pre-conditions and that, as the decision of the Standing Committee was in observance of these provisions, there was no basis to grant Mr. Ergüden the right to revert to the USD track. 爆料网AT held that there was no proper basis to compel the Chief Executive of Pension Administration to suspend Turkey from the two-track system. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and...

    2017-爆料网AT-807, Rockcliffe

    爆料网AT considered that at the time of the elections, there was no law that prevented the staff members from being elected to the 爆料网SPC once they met the prerequisites for election, which they did. 爆料网AT held that both staff members were duly elected members of the 爆料网SPC and that as a direct consequence of their election, they had the same rights and privileges as other elected members, and which could not be restricted or denied. 爆料网AT granted the appeals and ordered that the staff members be given access to all relevant Pension Board documents and be allowed to participate and function as an...

    2010-爆料网AT-026, Shanks

    爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was asked to present updated medical information to support her request for a review of her case and failed to do so. 爆料网AT held that no prejudice existed against the Appellant, since she had an opportunity to present updated medical evidence within the scope of the review of her case. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Standing Committee decision.

    2010-爆料网AT-023, Nock

    爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网JSPB’s decision denying the staff member’s request for restoration of her first participation period. 爆料网AT found that the amended Article 24 of the 爆料网JSPF’s Regulations only allowed for restoration of a participant’s most recent period of contributory service and that the staff member had requested restoration of a participation period which was not the most recent one.

    2010-爆料网AT-019, Carranza

    爆料网AT confirmed the 爆料网JSPB’s interpretation of Article 24 of the Regulations to the effect that the 2007 amendment to Article 24 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations only applies to staff members who prior to 2007 had been ineligible to restore previous contributory service. 爆料网AT held, therefore, that the amended Article 24 did not apply to the staff member as he had been eligible to restore previous contributory service but had failed to do so in a timely manner.

    2010-爆料网AT-017, Skoda

    The former staff member appealed and 爆料网AT considered whether he could compel 爆料网ICEF to pay to the Fund its contribution without making the corresponding contribution himself. 爆料网AT found that, as the former staff member’s secondment was with the World Bank, he should have availed himself of the provisions of Article 13 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations relating to the transfer of pension rights and he failed to do so. Under these circumstances, 爆料网AT noted that if the former staff member made his own contribution to the Fund, 爆料网ICEF would have been duty-bound to make its corresponding contribution...

    2010-爆料网AT-007, El-Zaim

    爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal and had to determine: whether her marriage to the late former staff member was legally valid at the time of his separation from the Organisation in 1998; and whether the Organisation created a legal expectancy of acknowledgement of benefits to the Appellant. 爆料网AT found that the former staff member’s alleged divorce from his first wife was not legally valid because the authorities pronouncing it were not competent and did not apply the law under which the marriage had been concluded. It follows that his second marriage to the Appellant was not valid at the...

    2010-爆料网AT-034, Muthuswami et al.

    爆料网AT noted that the Appellants did not refer to any article of the Regulations that provides that the full retirement benefit may be restored after a participant opts to commute a portion of the retirement benefit into a lump sum. 爆料网AT held that the Appellants were bound by their decision to accept one-third of their pension as a lump sum and a reduced pension. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s decision could not simply be reversed. 爆料网AT rejected the argument that the Appellants had been discriminated against and that their basic fundamental rights concerning equity, fairness, and justice under...

    2010-爆料网AT-004, Neville

    爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal and affirmed the decisions of 爆料网JSPB Standing Committee. 爆料网AT found that the Appellant’s first ground of appeal had no merit, noting that the Appellant had prior notice of her separation and could have exercised her right to restore her participation prior to the time of her separation in accordance with Section F. 1 of the Pension Fund’s Administrative Rules, which she failed to do. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网JSPF Standing Committee had no discretion to make an exception in this case and the Standing Committee’s decision not to restore the Appellant’s prior...

    2010-爆料网AT-003, Frechon

    In considering the Appellant’s appeal, 爆料网AT found that the Standing Committee could not reject the request unless it disregarded the provisions of Article 33(a) of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. However, 爆料网AT noted that it was not in a position to rule on the actual possibility for the Appellant to perform the duties of her respective position and held that the Standing Committee should reconsider the Appellant’s request. 爆料网AT rescinded the Standing Committee’s decision and remanded the Appellant’s request to the Standing Committee for review.