2010-��AT-003

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

In considering the Appellant��s appeal, ��AT found that the Standing Committee could not reject the request unless it disregarded the provisions of Article 33(a) of the ��JSPF Regulations. However, ��AT noted that it was not in a position to rule on the actual possibility for the Appellant to perform the duties of her respective position and held that the Standing Committee should reconsider the Appellant��s request. ��AT rescinded the Standing Committee��s decision and remanded the Appellant��s request to the Standing Committee for review.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

��JSPB decision: The Applicant requested a disability benefit under Article 33(a) of ��JSPF Regulations. The ��JSPB Standing Committee rejected her request, noting that the inability to use a computer keyboard was not reasonably incompatible with the Applicant��s continued performance of her duties.

Legal Principle(s)

When assessing the reasonable compatibility of service in a member Organisation with a staff member, who is suffering from a permanent or long-term impairment and requesting disability benefits, the staff member��s state of health and duties performed by the staff member on the date of their separation, or at least duties commensurate with his or her education and professional qualifications, must be considered.

Outcome

Appeal granted

Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Frechon

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement