爆料网

爆料网DT Statute

  • Article 1
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.3
  • Article 10.4
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.7
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 105
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.2(c)
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 11.5
  • Article 11.6
  • Article 12
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 12.2
  • Article 12.3
  • Article 12.4
  • Article 12.5
  • Article 15.7
  • Article 18.2
  • Article 18.3
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.7(b)
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 3
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 3.1(a)
  • Article 3.1(b)
  • Article 3.1(c)
  • Article 32
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 4.5
  • Article 4.9
  • Article 6
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.2(e)
  • Article 7.2(h)
  • Article 7.2(i)
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 7(b)
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(a)
  • Article 8.1(a)
  • Article 8.1(b)
  • Article 8.1(b)(ii)
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)–(iv)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(a)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.1(d)(ii)
  • Article 8.1(d)(iii)
  • Article 8.1(d)(iv)
  • Article 8.1(i)
  • Article 8.1(i)(b)
  • Article 8.1(ii)
  • Article 8.1(ii)(c)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.2(d)(i)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.3(a)
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.5
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 8(a)
  • Article 8(c)
  • Article 8(d)(i)
  • Article 8(d)(ii)
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 611 - 620 of 1867
    2018-爆料网AT-833, Koumoin

    爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing since it did not find that an oral hearing would assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT Summary judgment, finding that the application was manifestly inadmissible, was not tainted by any errors. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was asking for the execution of an alleged default judgment issued by the first instance court in the previous proceedings more than six years earlier, and for enforcement of a non-existent mediation agreement. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2018-爆料网AT-823, Ngoga

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s finding that the application contesting the decision to recover overpayments was not receivable ratione temporis was correct since the Appellant waited nearly two years until filing his application to the 爆料网DT, which was clearly outside the time limit. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that the Appellant’s application against the decision to reject retroactive payment of dependency allowance for his adopted children was not receivable ratione materiae because the Appellant failed to request management evaluation within the time limits provided in Staff Rule 11. 2. 爆料网AT dismissed the...

    2018-爆料网AT-824, Mbok

    爆料网AT denied the request for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that the Appellant should have requested a management evaluation of decision on or before 16 December 2014 and that he did not do so until 3 January 2017. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that the application was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2018-爆料网AT-820, Newland

    爆料网AT held that requesting management evaluation was a mandatory first step. 爆料网AT found that that the Personnel Action forms could not be construed as adequately notifying the Appellant of the relevant administrative decision to process his retirement and separation from service. 爆料网AT held that the memorandum that gave instructions pertaining to the Appellant’s separation from service and repatriation to his home country triggered the time limit to seek management evaluation. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to seek a management evaluation within that time. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s finding that...

    2018-爆料网AT-819, Mbaigolmem

    爆料网AT held that the undisputed facts, the evidence of a credible report, coherent hearsay evidence pointing to a pattern of behaviour, the consistency of the witness statements, the unsatisfactory statement of the staff member, and the inherent probabilities of the situation, taken cumulatively, constituted a clear and convincing concatenation of evidence establishing, with a high degree of probability, that the alleged misconduct in fact occurred. 爆料网AT noted that the Organisation is entitled to and obliged to pursue a severe approach to sexual harassment and that the message, therefore, needs...

    2018-爆料网AT-810, Al Hallaj

    Both parties appealed. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred by finding a valid contract of employment between Ms Al Hallaj and ESCWA since no letter of appointment was issued, only an offer of employment. 爆料网AT held that a quasi-contract was formed, considering that Ms Al Hallaj had unconditionally accepted and had fully fulfilled all the conditions specified in the offer of employment. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that the ESCWA Administration committed two major errors, in breach of its quasi-contractual obligations. 爆料网AT held that the ESCWA Administration failed in its due diligence to specify clearly and...

    2018-爆料网AT-815, Nchimbi

    Both parties appealed. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct regarding the non-receivability ratione materiae with respect to the first three decisions. 爆料网AT, however, disagreed with 爆料网DT’s finding that the Administration had unlawfully delayed check-out, including his final payments and the submission of the required forms for his pension, since the period of three and a half months which was taken by the Administration to investigate and proceed with Mr Nchimbi’s “check-out” was not unreasonable in the given circumstances. 爆料网AT upheld the Secretary-General's appeal and dismissed Mr Nchimbi’s...

    2018-爆料网AT-816, Harris

    爆料网AT denied the request for an oral hearing since the factual and legal issues of the appeal were clearly defined. 爆料网AT rejected to annex a medical report as evidence since the Appellant had not filed a motion, finding that the admission of documents was not in the interest of justice and the efficient and expeditious resolution of the proceedings. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable ratione materiae, considering that the 爆料网DT Statute, in unequivocal terms, provides that the decision of 爆料网DT on an application for suspension of action shall not be subject to appeal. 爆料网AT dismissed the...

    2019-爆料网AT-977, Symeonides

    The Appellant sought reversal of the 爆料网DT judgment with respect to his claims regarding overtime and the unsustainability of his working environment, and compensation. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was unable to provide any evidence showing that he had requested overtime compensation in writing, or that the Administration did not respond or responded negatively. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to submit a request for management evaluation. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to file a complaint of harassment and abuse of authority as required by ST/SGB/2008/5. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and...