±¬ÁÏÍø

±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the Appellant merely repeated arguments raised before ±¬ÁÏÍøDT regarding the evidence. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT accepted ±¬ÁÏÍøDT¡¯s finding that there was clear and convincing evidence to establish the facts underlying the allegations of misconduct. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that ±¬ÁÏÍøDT applied the appropriate legal standard, namely clear and convincing evidence. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that ±¬ÁÏÍøDT heard the evidence of the complainant, other material witnesses, assessed the credibility and reliability of the testimony under oath before it, determined the probable facts and then rendered a decision as to whether the onus to establish the...

The established facts qualified as misconduct under the Staff Regulations and Rules. There was evidence that the totality of the circumstances, including mitigating factors such as the Applicant¡¯s long service with the Organization and her admission, albeit only after the Organization¡¯s discovery of her fraud, were considered in keeping with set principles. There was basis for the assertion that the practice of the Secretary-General in disciplinary matters shows that measures at the stricter end of the spectrum have normally been imposed by the Organization in cases involving falsification of...