2025-爆料网AT-1531, Sandrine Guezel
L'爆料网AT a estimé que l'爆料网DT avait correctement conclu que le retard de 30 mois pris par l'ABCC dans le traitement de la demande d'indemnisation était excessif. Il a estimé qu'un délai raisonnable pour prendre une décision dans cette affaire n'aurait pas d? dépasser 24 semaines. Il a estimé que le retard supplémentaire de 24 mois et 13 jours, sans explication adéquate, était illégal et violait l'obligation de l'Administration de traiter les personnes à charge du fonctionnaire décédé de manière équitable et raisonnable.
En ce qui concerne l'indemnisation accordée, le T爆料网U a confirmé la décision...
2025-爆料网AT-1524, Maria Alejandra Mouchabek
L'爆料网AT a noté que la lettre du membre du personnel concernant sa retraite anticipée devait être considérée comme une lettre de démission. L'爆料网AT a noté que quelques mois plus tard, elle avait envoyé une autre lettre à l'Administration demandant le retrait de sa démission. L'爆料网AT a estimé que le TFP n'avait pas commis d'erreur de droit en identifiant la décision contestée comme étant la décision de ne pas accepter le retrait de la démission de la fonctionnaire, et que l'approche du TFP ne lui avait pas causé de préjudice puisqu'il avait pu examiner tous ses arguments.
L'爆料网AT a estimé que la...
2025-爆料网AT-1512, Reynaud Joseph-Marie Theunens
L'爆料网AT a jugé que la décision contestée était légale. Il a estimé que le TFP avait correctement analysé les éléments de preuve présentés, en motivant de manière détaillée l'acceptation ou le rejet du témoignage de chaque témoin et, surtout, en tenant compte de l'aveu par le fonctionnaire de nombreux faits essentiels. Il s'agissait notamment de reconna?tre : l'existence de tensions entre lui-même et les membres du personnel international et national ; qu'il était probablement trop exigeant en tant que supérieur hiérarchique ; qu'il avait élevé la voix au travail ; qu'il avait fait référence aux...
2025-爆料网AT-1540, Angiolo Rolli
The 爆料网AT found that the unexplained delay of almost a year in filing the request for interpretation would alone cause the 爆料网AT to reject it. The 爆料网AT held that, in addition, the request for interpretation lacked a jurisdictional basis. The 爆料网AT found that the staff member had demonstrated no equivocality or lack of clarity of the Judgment.
The 爆料网AT was of the view that the request for execution relied on the staff member’s success in having the earlier Judgment interpreted in the manner he sought and, therefore, his request for execution was moot. The 爆料网AT further noted that the Judgment had...
2025-爆料网AT-1535, Koffi Gilles Wilfried Amani
The 爆料网AT held that even if it were to consider that his request for management evaluation had not been premature but valid in respect of all the non-payment decisions, the request had been submitted belatedly. The 爆料网AT found that the staff member should have submitted the request for management evaluation within 60 days from receipt of his final pay statement. The 爆料网AT concluded that the 爆料网DT had not erred in finding that his request had not been timely and had not committed an error by obscuring the underlying facts of the case.
The 爆料网AT was of the view that it was unclear what Covid-19...
2025-爆料网AT-1532, Hakam Shahwan
The 爆料网AT noted that the Agency had removed the disputed Note from the staff member’s Official Status File and provided him with his requested certificate of service and performance evaluations. The 爆料网AT found that the appeal in the respective part had therefore become moot.
The 爆料网AT held that even if the issue were not moot, it was not persuaded that the 爆料网WRA DT had exercised its discretion injudiciously or otherwise erred. The 爆料网AT noted that in its earlier Judgment it had found that the Agency had no obligation to partially execute that first 爆料网RWA DT Judgment.
The 爆料网AT found that the staff...
2025-爆料网AT-1531, Sandrine Guezel
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT correctly concluded that the ABCC’s 30-month delay in processing the claim for compensation was excessive. It found that a reasonable delay for decision-making in this claim would have been no more than 24 weeks. It held that the additional delay of 24 months and 13 days, without adequate explanation, was unlawful and violated the Administration’s duty to treat the dependents of the deceased staff member fairly and reasonably.
With respect to the compensation awarded, the 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT’s award of six months’ net base salary for moral harm. However, the...
2025-爆料网AT-1524, Maria Alejandra Mouchabek
The 爆料网AT noted that the staff member’s letter regarding early retirement was to be considered a letter of resignation. The 爆料网AT noted that a few months later she had sent another letter to the Administration requesting to withdraw her resignation. The 爆料网AT found that the 爆料网DT had not erred in law when it identified the contested decision as the decision not to accept the staff member’s withdrawal of her resignation, and the 爆料网DT’s approach had not caused prejudice to her as it had been able to examine all her contentions.
The 爆料网AT held that the staff member’s resignation produced its legal...
2025-爆料网AT-1512, Reynaud Joseph-Marie Theunens
The 爆料网AT held that the contested decision was lawful. It held that the 爆料网DT appropriately analysed the evidence presented, providing detailed reasons for accepting or rejecting each witness’s testimony and, importantly, considered the staff member’s admission of many of the key facts. These included acknowledging that: tensions existed between himself and both staff and national staff members; he was probably too demanding as a manager; he raised his voice at work; he referred to the sects of certain national staff members; he had difficult interpersonal issues with Complainant 1; he...
2025-爆料网AT-1519, Fernando Salon
The 爆料网AT rejected Mr. Salon’s argument that the prior 爆料网AT Judgment made incorrect findings of fact regarding the dates that he made requests for management evaluation or filed complaints. The 爆料网AT held that Mr. Salon was not seeking clarification of the 爆料网AT Judgment but was rather attempting to relitigate his case, which is not an appropriate use of the 爆料网AT Statute’s provisions for an application for interpretation.
The 爆料网AT found that there was no ambiguity in its Judgment and there was no basis for the application for interpretation. The meaning and scope of the 爆料网AT Judgment was clear...
2025-爆料网AT-1522, Sanjaya Bahel
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred in suggesting that it was the former staff member’s burden to provide evidence to support his assertion that his request for review had been pending before the Dispute Tribunal since July 2009 and to produce a record of his case having been transferred to it from the JDC in July 2009.
The 爆料网AT further held that the Administration’s response, that his claim was closed due to his failure to pursue it for over 12 years, was neither an administrative decision, nor was it the Administration’s prerogative to make regarding the judicial proceeding. The Administration...
2025-爆料网AT-1544, Antonio Ponce Gonzalez
The 爆料网AT observed that Mr. Ponce-Gonzalez was attempting to persuade the Appeals Tribunal that an official who claimed to have delegated authority to make hiring decisions did not in fact have such authority. Mr. Ponce-Gonzalez claimed to have new documents in support of his argument.
The 爆料网AT held that the new facts discovered did not meet the statutory requirement for decisiveness on the outcome of the earlier appeal and hence the application for revision did not satisfy the strict statutory test under Article 11(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute, and the application was denied.
2025-爆料网AT-1543, Antonio Ponce Gonzalez
The 爆料网AT observed that Mr. Ponce-Gonzalez was attempting to persuade the Appeals Tribunal that an official who claimed to have delegated authority to make hiring decisions did not in fact have such authority. Mr. Ponce-Gonzalez claimed to have new documents in support of his argument.
The 爆料网AT held that the new facts discovered did not meet the statutory requirement for decisiveness on the outcome of the earlier appeal and hence the application for revision did not satisfy the strict statutory test under Article 11(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute, and was denied.
2025-爆料网AT-1561, HUDA HANNINA
The 爆料网AT observed that the 爆料网DT did not err in denying the staff member’s request for an oral hearing as the case record was “comprehensive” and there was “no irreconcilable dispute of facts between the parties.”
The 爆料网AT held that the staff member’s placement on ALWP was justified, given that the staff member was provided with the names of the members of the fact-finding panel assigned to investigate her alleged misconduct, and that she was in a position to approve the consultancy contract of one of those members, which created a conflict of interest and a genuine risk of interference in the...
2025-爆料网AT-1555, Carolina Larriera
The Appeals Tribunal analyzed the text of Appendix D, from the 1966 version, and concluded that: (a) widows are eligible to receive compensation at a rate of two-fifths of a deceased staff member’s annual salary; (b) if the deceased staff member is survived by more than one widow, the compensation shall be split evenly between the widows; (c) all pension benefits paid through the staff member’s 爆料网JSPF entitlement shall be deducted from the compensation paid under Appendix D; and the deduction shall not reduce the amount of Appendix D compensation otherwise payable to less than 10 per cent of...
2025-爆料网AT-1542, AAO
The 爆料网AT held that there was no error of law or fact by the 爆料网DT in finding that the allegations of sexual harassment and workplace harassment were proven to the clear and convincing evidence standard. The 爆料网DT had the advantage of seeing and hearing the evidence of the principal witnesses to, and relating to, the events. There was therefore ample evidence to confirm the 爆料网DT’s assessments of the occurrence and significance of the events. The 爆料网DT was also entitled to draw the inference that AAO, rebuffed in his sexual advances by the complainant, retaliated subsequently through workplace...
2025-爆料网AT-1554, ABD
The 爆料网AT noted that ABD’s appeal was filed within 60 days of the Order’s issuance, but more than 30 days after that event. Given that under Article 7(1)(c) of the 爆料网AT Statute, a party has 30 days to appeal an order, ABD was out of time to appeal against the impugned 爆料网DT Order.
The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal as not receivable.
2025-爆料网AT-1517, Ayesha Al Rifai
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT did not err in finding that there was clear and convincing evidence to support that the applicant had engaged in abuse of authority by intimidating a staff member to file a false complaint of sexual harassment against another staff member. The 爆料网RWA DT weighed the conflicting testimonies and assessed the credibility of the witnesses and found that she had a motive to solicit the false complaint.
The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网RWA DT did not err in declining to review the other misconduct allegations against her, given that the abuse of authority allegation was the...
2025-爆料网AT-1527, BK
L'爆料网AT a noté que le fonctionnaire souffrait d'un problème médical nécessitant des soins qui avait une incidence sur sa capacité à reprendre le travail, qu'il avait consenti à l'examen médical indépendant et qu'il n'avait pas contesté ces dossiers devant le TDPI ni en appel.
L'爆料网AT a estimé que même si la décision ST/AI/2019/1 était applicable aux fonctionnaires du HCR ou considérée comme un modèle de pratique équitable, elle n'aurait pas rendu l'examen médical indépendant irrégulier.
L'爆料网AT n'a trouvé aucun motif pour infirmer la décision de l'爆料网DT selon laquelle il n'y avait aucune preuve de...
2025-爆料网AT-1526, BK
L'爆料网AT a noté que les ordonnances contestées rejetant les demandes d'anonymat du fonctionnaire avaient été rendues moins d'un mois après que le TFP ait fait droit à sa demande d'anonymat dans une autre affaire.
L'爆料网AT a estimé que les ordonnances contestées n'étaient pas isolées et que l'interaction de toutes ces procédures rendait la situation exceptionnelle. Le T爆料网AT a estimé que le fait de lui refuser l'anonymat pour ses deux demandes uniquement irait à l'encontre de l'objectif de l'anonymat et que, dans les circonstances particulières de cette procédure, cette incohérence portait atteinte à...